Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Epistemology, health and gender: dialogues between cardiology and the social sciences

Epistemología, salud y género: diálogos entre la cardiología y las ciencias sociales;
Epistemologia, saúde e gênero: diálogos entre cardiologia e ciências sociais

dc.creatorMoutran-Barroso, Habib Georges
dc.date2020-07-04
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T20:19:38Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T20:19:38Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/RCB/article/view/3091
dc.identifier10.18270/rcb.v15i1.3091
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/10464
dc.descriptionThe discussion and distinction between the categories sex and gender in medical research has been consolidated as a significant contribution from feminist theories and the philosophy of science. However, the distinction between the categories of sex and gender, in the structuring of medical knowledge, was not identified until the 1970s. Despite this finding, the design of medical research that does not contemplate such concepts continues to be prevalent differences, so that an indistinct use is made between both categories and a knowledge is generated from this categorical error. Several researchers in the area of health and philosophy of sciences have developed frameworks for the identification of such errors, as well as their consequences in public health policies, especially in diseases such as acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, from an intersectional analysis between the health sciences and the philosophy of science, some reflections on this problem will be presented in this text.en-US
dc.descriptionLa discusión y distinción entre las categorías sexo y género en las investigaciones médicas se ha consolidado como un aporte significado desde las teorías feministas y la filosofía de las ciencias. No obstante, la distinción entre las categorías de sexo y género, en la estructuración del conocimiento médico, no fue identificada sino hasta la década del 70’. A pesar de este hallazgo, continúa siendo prevalente el diseño de investigaciones médicas que no contemplan tales diferencias, por lo que se hace un uso indistinto entre ambas categorías y se genera un conocimiento a partir de este error categorial. Varias investigadoras en el área de la salud y la filosofía de las ciencias han elaborado marcos de referencia para la identificación de dichos errores, al igual que sus consecuencias en las políticas de la salud pública, especialmente en enfermedades como el infarto agudo de miocardio. Por lo tanto, a partir de un análisis interseccional entre las ciencias de la salud y la filosofía de las ciencias, se expondrá en este texto algunas reflexiones acerca de esta problemática.es-ES
dc.descriptionA discussão e a distinção entre as categorias sexo e gênero na pesquisa médica consolidaram-se como contribuição significativa das teorias feministas e da filosofia da ciência. No entanto, a distinção entre as categorias de sexo e gênero, na estruturação do conhecimento médico, não foi identificada até a década de 70. Apesar desse achado, o desenho da pesquisa médica que não contempla tais conceitos continua prevalecendo. diferenças, de modo que um uso indistinto é feito entre as duas categorias e um conhecimento é gerado a partir deste erro categórico. Diversos pesquisadores da área de saúde e filosofia das ciências desenvolveram marcos para a identificação desses erros, bem como suas consequências nas políticas públicas de saúde, especialmente em doenças como o infarto agudo do miocárdio. Portanto, a partir de uma análise interseccional entre as ciências da saúde e a filosofia da ciência, algumas reflexões sobre esse problema serão apresentadas neste texto.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad El Bosquees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/RCB/article/view/3091/2465
dc.relation/*ref*/Fernández-Sáez, J., Ruiz-Cantero, M. T., Guijarro-Garví, M., Carrasco-Portiño, M., Roca-Pérez, V., Chilet-Rosell, E., & Álvarez-Dardet, C. (2013). Looking twice at the gender equity index for public health impact. BMC Public Health, 13, 659. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-659
dc.relation/*ref*/Garcia, M., Mulvagh, S. L., Merz, C. N. B., Buring, J. E., & Manson, J. E. (2016). Cardiovascular disease in women: Clinical perspectives. Circulation Research, 118(8), 1273-1293. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.307547
dc.relation/*ref*/Hammarström, A., & Hensing, G. (2018). How gender theories are used in contemporary public health research. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0712-x
dc.relation/*ref*/Harding, S. (1996). Ciencia y feminismo. Madrid: Ediciones Mortada.
dc.relation/*ref*/Harding, S. G. (1991). Whose science? whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Humphries, K. H., Izadnegadar, M., Sedlak, T., Saw, J., Johnston, N., Schenck-Gustafsson, K., . . . Bairey Merz, C. N. (2017). Sex differences in cardiovascular disease - impact on care and outcomes. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 46, 46-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.04.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Intemann, K., & Melo-Martín, I. (2014). Addressing problems in profit-driven research: How can feminist conceptions of objectivity help? European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 4, 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-013-0079-9
dc.relation/*ref*/Kendel, F., Gelbrich, G., Wirtz, M., Lehmkuhl, E., Knoll, N., Hetzer, R., & Regitz-Zagrosek, V. (2010). Predictive relationship between depression and physical functioning after coronary surgery. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(19), 1717-1721. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.368
dc.relation/*ref*/Krieger, N. (1996). Inequality, diversity, and health: Thoughts on "race/ethnicity" and "gender". Journal of the American Medical Women's Association (1972), 51(4), 133-136.
dc.relation/*ref*/Krieger, N. (2003). Genders, sexes, and health: What are the connections-and why does it matter? International Journal of Epidemiology, 32(4), 652-657. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyg156
dc.relation/*ref*/Krieger, N. (2012). Methods for the scientific study of discrimination and health: An ecosocial approach. American Journal of Public Health, 102(5), 936-944. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300544
dc.relation/*ref*/Lloyd-Jones, D., Adams, R. J., Brown, T. M., Carnethon, M., Dai, S., De Simone, G., Wylie-Rosett, J. (2010). Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: A report from the american heart association. Circulation, 121(7), e46-e215. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192667
dc.relation/*ref*/Melo-Martín, I., & Intemann, K. (2007). Can ethical reasoning contribute to better epidemiology? A case study in research on racial health disparities. European Journal of Epidemiology, 22, 215-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-007-9108-3
dc.relation/*ref*/Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. (2019). Análisis de situación de salud (ASIS) Colombia, 2018.
dc.relation/*ref*/Mortensen, O. S., Bjorner, J. B., Newman, B., Oldenburg, B., Groenvold, M., Madsen, J. K., & Andersen, H. R. (2007). Gender differences in health-related quality of life following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Women and men do not benefit from primary percutaneous coronary intervention to the same degree. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation: Official Journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology, 14(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e3280114f00
dc.relation/*ref*/Regitz-Zagrosek, V. (2017). [Gender and cardiovascular diseases: Why we need gender medicine]. Der Internist, 58(4), 336-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-017-0214-3
dc.relation/*ref*/Regitz-Zagrosek, V. (2006). Therapeutic implications of the gender-specific aspects of cardiovascular disease. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, 5(5), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2032
dc.relation/*ref*/Regitz-Zagrosek, V. (2011). Sex and gender differences in symptoms of myocardial ischaemia. European Heart Journal, 32(24), 3064-3066. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr272
dc.relation/*ref*/Regitz-Zagrosek, V. (2012). Sex and gender differences in health. science & society series on sex and science. EMBO Reports, 13(7), 596-603. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.87
dc.relation/*ref*/Rivera, M. (2017). Mujeres y pobreza: Una discusión entre universalismo y el paternalismo. Revista Colombiana De Bioética, 11, 62. https://doi.org/10.18270/rcb.v11i3.2161
dc.relation/*ref*/Ruiz, M. T. (2004). Sesgos de género en el esfuerzo terapéutico. Gac Sanit 18 (1): 118-25. https://doi.org/10.1157/13062260
dc.relation/*ref*/Ruiz, M. T. (2009). Sesgos de género en la atención sanitaria. Universidad de Alicante. Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Alicante: 2009.
dc.relation/*ref*/Shannon, G., Jansen, M., Williams, K., Cáceres, C., Motta, A., Odhiambo, A. Mannell, J. (2019). Gender equality in science, medicine, and global health: Where are we at and why does it matter? The Lancet, 393(10171), 560-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33135-0
dc.relation/*ref*/Zakiniaeiz, Y., Cosgrove, K. P., Potenza, M. N., & Mazure, C. M. (2016). Balance of the sexes: Addressing sex differences in preclinical research. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 89(2), 255-259.
dc.relation/*ref*/Zucker, I., & Beery, A. K. (2010). Males still dominate animal studies. Nature, 465(7299), 690-690. https://doi.org/10.1038/465690a
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Bioética; Vol 15 No 1 (2020): Revista Colombiana de Bioética Vol. 15, No. 1en-US
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Bioética; ##issue.vol## 15 ##issue.no## 1 (2020): Revista Colombiana de Bioética Vol. 15, No. 1es-AR
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Bioética; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2020): Revista Colombiana de Bioética Vol. 15, No. 1es-ES
dc.source2590-9452
dc.source1900-6896
dc.subjectsaludes-ES
dc.subjectgéneroes-ES
dc.subjectepistemologíaes-ES
dc.subjectepidemiologíaes-ES
dc.subjectcardiologíaes-ES
dc.subjectfeminismoes-ES
dc.subjectteoría feminista del punto de vistaes-ES
dc.titleEpistemology, health and gender: dialogues between cardiology and the social sciencesen-US
dc.titleEpistemología, salud y género: diálogos entre la cardiología y las ciencias socialeses-ES
dc.titleEpistemologia, saúde e gênero: diálogos entre cardiologia e ciências sociaispt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeTexten-US
dc.typeTextoes-ES
dc.typeTextopt-BR


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem