Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Improving Flood Forecasting Skill with the Ensemble Kalman Filter

dc.creatorVergara, Humberto
dc.creatorHong, Yang
dc.creatorGourley, Jonathan
dc.date2016-03-05
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T20:40:12Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T20:40:12Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/RevTec/article/view/1294
dc.identifier10.18270/rt.v13i1.1294
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/10699
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this particular work was to explore the benefits and drawbacks of sequential state updating for flood forecasting and identify factors or mechanisms affecting the updating process and thus controlling its performance. The Ensemble Kalman filter was employed to assimilate hourly streamflow observations into a simple but widely used conceptual rainfall-runoff model for flood prediction purposes. Ensembles were constructed by perturbing model forcing and parameters. Parametric perturbations were obtained from multiple model calibrations with an optimization algorithm. Errors in streamflow observations were characterized through an innovative yet simple empirical model. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the improvement of the first guess forecast. Additionally, the forecast skill was assessed as a function of lead-time. It was found that the improvement is mainly reflected in runoff volume, while the peak timecan be deteriorated as a trade-off of the assimilation process. Overall, ensemble-based models with sequential data assimilation outperformed the best-calibrated deterministic models for lead times of at least 1.5 days.en-US
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this particular work was to explore the benefits and drawbacks of sequential state updating for flood forecasting and identify factors or mechanisms affecting the updating process and thus controlling its performance. The Ensemble Kalman filter was employed to assimilate hourly streamflow observations into a simple but widely used conceptual rainfall-runoff model for flood prediction purposes. Ensembles were constructed by perturbing model forcing and parameters. Parametric perturbations were obtained from multiple model calibrations with an optimization algorithm. Errors in streamflow observations were characterized through an innovative yet simple empirical model. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the improvement of the first guess forecast. Additionally, the forecast skill was assessed as a function of lead-time. It was found that the improvement is mainly reflected in runoff volume, while the peak timecan be deteriorated as a trade-off of the assimilation process. Overall, ensemble-based models with sequential data assimilation outperformed the best-calibrated deterministic models for lead times of at least 1.5 days.es-AR
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this particular work was to explore the benefits and drawbacks of sequential state updating for flood forecasting and identify factors or mechanisms affecting the updating process and thus controlling its performance. The Ensemble Kalman filter was employed to assimilate hourly streamflow observations into a simple but widely used conceptual rainfall-runoff model for flood prediction purposes. Ensembles were constructed by perturbing model forcing and parameters. Parametric perturbations were obtained from multiple model calibrations with an optimization algorithm. Errors in streamflow observations were characterized through an innovative yet simple empirical model. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the improvement of the first guess forecast. Additionally, the forecast skill was assessed as a function of lead-time. It was found that the improvement is mainly reflected in runoff volume, while the peak timecan be deteriorated as a trade-off of the assimilation process. Overall, ensemble-based models with sequential data assimilation outperformed the best-calibrated deterministic models for lead times of at least 1.5 days.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad El Bosquees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/RevTec/article/view/1294/901
dc.relation/*ref*/Adhikari, P., Y. Hong, K. Douglas, D. Kirschbaum, J. Gourley, R. Adler, and G. Robert Brakenridge (2010). "A digitized global flood inventory (1998– 2008): compilation and preliminary results." Natural Hazards 55 (2):405-422.
dc.relation/*ref*/Aubert, D., C. Loumagne, and L. Oudin (2003). "Sequential assimilation of soil moisture and streamflow data in a conceptual rainfall–runoff model." Journal of Hydrology 280 (1-4):145-161.
dc.relation/*ref*/Briedenbach, J. P., and J. S. Bradberry (2001). "Multisensor precipitation estimates produced by the National Weather Service River Forecast Centers for hydrologic applications." Paper read at 2001 Georgia Water Resources Conference, at Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.
dc.relation/*ref*/Burnash, R. J. C., R. L. Ferral, and R. A. McGuire. 1973. A general streamflow simulation system - Conceptual modeling for digital computers. In Report by the Joint Federal State River Forecasts Center, Sacramento, California.
dc.relation/*ref*/Carpenter, T. M., J. A. Sperfslage, K. P. Georgakakos, T. Sweeney, and D. Fread (1999). "National threshold runoff estimation utilizing GIS in support of operational flash flood warning systems." Journal of Hydrology 224:21-44.
dc.relation/*ref*/Clark, M., D. Rupp, R. Woods, X. Zheng, R. Ibbitt, A. Slater, J. Schmidt, and M. Uddstrom (2008). "Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model." Advances in Water Resources 31 (10):1309-1324.
dc.relation/*ref*/Di Baldassarre, G., and A. Montanari (2009). "Uncertainty in river discharge observations: a quantitative analysis." Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 13 (6):913-921.
dc.relation/*ref*/Evensen, G. (2003). "The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation." Ocean Dynamics 53 (4):343-367.
dc.relation/*ref*/Fulton, R. (2002). "Activities to improve WSR-88D Radar Rainfall Estimation in the National Weather Service." Paper read at 2nd Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, July, 2002, at Las Vegas, Nevada.
dc.relation/*ref*/Gourley, J. J., Z. L. Flamig, Y. Hong, and K. W. Howard (2011). "Evaluation of past, present, and future tools for radar-based flash flood prediction." Hydro. Sci. J. (in review).
dc.relation/*ref*/Hamill, T. M. 2006. Ensemble-based atmospheric data assimilation. In Predictability of weather and climate, edited by T. Palmer and R. Hagedorn. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Houser, P. R., W. J. Shuttleworth, J. S. Famiglietti, H. V. Gupta, K. H. Syed, and D. C. Goodrich (1998). "Integration of soil moisture remote sensing and hydrologic modeling using data assimilation." Water Resour. Res. 34 (12):3405-3420.
dc.relation/*ref*/Huang, C., X. Lin., L. Lu, and J. Gu (2008). "Experiments of one-dimensional soil moisture assimilation system based on ensemble Kalman filter." Remote Sensing of Environment 112 (3):888-900.
dc.relation/*ref*/Jazwinski, A. (1970). "Stochastic Processes and Filtering." Dover Publications.
dc.relation/*ref*/Kalnay, E. (2003). "Atmospheric modeling, data assimilation, and predictability." Cambridge Univ Pr.
dc.relation/*ref*/Kitanidis, P. K., and R. L. Bras (1980). "Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 1. Analysis of uncertainty." Water Resour. Res. 16 (6):1025-1033. Revista de Tecnología ¦ Journal of Technology ¦ Volumen 13 ¦ Número 1 ¦ Págs. 9-27 ¦ 25 Improving Flood Forecasting Skill with the Ensemble Kalman Filter
dc.relation/*ref*/Komma, J., G. Bloschl, and C. Reszler (2008). "Soil moisture updating by Ensemble Kalman Filtering in real-time flood forecasting." Journal of Hydrology 357 (3-4):228-242.
dc.relation/*ref*/Krause, P., D. P. Boyle, and F. Base (2005). "Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment." Advances in Geosciences 5:89-97.
dc.relation/*ref*/McMillan, H., J. Freer, F. Pappenberger, T. Krueger, and M. Clark (2010). "Impacts of uncertain river flow data on rainfall-runoff model calibration and discharge predictions." Hydrological Processes 24:1270–1284.
dc.relation/*ref*/Moore, R. J. (1985). "The probability-distributed principle and runoff production at point and basin scales." Hydrological Sciences 30 (2):273-297.
dc.relation/*ref*/Moradkhani, H. (2008). "Hydrologic Remote Sensing and Land Surface Data Assimilation." Sensors 8 (5):2986-3004.
dc.relation/*ref*/Moradkhani, H., S. Sorooshian, H. Gupta, and P. Houser (2005). "Dual state?parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter." Advances in Water Resources 28 (2):135-147.
dc.relation/*ref*/Neal, J., P. Atkinson, and C. Hutton (2007). "Flood inundation model updating using an ensemble Kalman filter and spatially distributed measurements." Journal of Hydrology 336 (3-4):401-415.
dc.relation/*ref*/Petersen-Overleir, A. (2004). "Accounting for heteroscedasticity in rating curve estimates." Journal of Hydrology 292 (1-4):173-181.
dc.relation/*ref*/RAH-Web-Team. (2011). "Past Events." Event inventory of the National Weather Service (NWS) forecast office at Raleigh, <http://www.erh.noaa.gov/rah/events/> May 15, 2011
dc.relation/*ref*/Reichle, R. H., D. Entekhabi, and D. B. McLaughlin (2001). "Downscaling of radio brightness measurements for soil moisture estimation: A four-dimensional variational data assimilation approach." Water Resour. Res. 37 (9):2353-2364.
dc.relation/*ref*/Reichle, R. H., D. B. McLaughlin, and D. Entekhabi (2002). "Hydrologic data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter." Monthly Weather Review 130 (1):103-114.
dc.relation/*ref*/Salamon, P., and L. Feyen (2009). "Assessing parameter, precipitation, and predictive uncertainty in a distributed hydrological model using sequential data assimilation with the particle filter." Journal of Hydrology 376 (3-4):428-442.
dc.relation/*ref*/Sauer, V. B., and R. W. Meyer. 1992. Determination of Error in Individual Discharge Measurments. Norcross, Georgia: U.S. Geological Survey.
dc.relation/*ref*/Seo, D.-J., V. Koren, and N. Cajina (2003). "Real-Time Variational Assimilation of Hydrologic and Hydrometeorological Data into Operational Hydrologic Forecasting." Journal of Hydrometeorology 4 (3):627-641.
dc.relation/*ref*/Smith, M., D. Seo, V. Koren, S. Reed, Z. Zhang, Q. Duan, F. Moreda, and S. Cong (2004). "The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment design." Journal of Hydrology 298 (1-4):4-26.
dc.relation/*ref*/Smith, P. J., K. J. Beven, and J. A. Tawn (2008). "Detection of structural inadequacy in process-based hydrological models: A particle-filtering approach." Water Resources Research 44 (1).
dc.relation/*ref*/Sorooshian, S., and J. A. Dracup (1980). "Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologie rainfall-runoff models: Correlated and heteroscedastic error cases." Water Resour. Res. 16 (2):430-442.
dc.relation/*ref*/USGS. (2011). "IDA." Instantaneous Data Archive - IDA, <http://ida.water.usgs.gov/ida/> June, 15, 2010
dc.relation/*ref*/USGS, and USAID. (2011). "USGS FEWS NET Data Portal." USGS FEWS NET Data Portal, <http://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/> July, 01, 2010
dc.relation/*ref*/Van Cooten, S., K. E. Kelleher, K. Howard, J. Zhang, J. J. Gourley, J. S. Kain, K. Nemunaitis-Monroe, Z. Flamig, H. Moser, A. Arthur, C. Langston, R. Kolar, Y. Hong, K. Dresback, E. Tromble, H. Vergara, R. A. Luettich, B. Blanton, H. Lander, K. Galluppi, J. P. Losego, C. A. Blain, J. Thigpen, K. Mosher, D. Figurskey, M. Moneypenny, J. Blaes, J. Orrock, R. Bandy, C. Goodall, J. G. W. Kelley, J. Greenlaw, M. Wengren, D. Eslinger, J. Payne, G. Olmi, J. Feldt, J. Schmidt, T. Hamill, R. Bacon, R. Stickney, and L. Spence (2011). "The CI-FLOW Project: A System 26 ¦ Revista de Tecnología ¦ Journal of Technology ¦ Volumen 13 ¦ Número 1 ¦ Págs. 9-27 Humberto Vergara, Yang Hong, Jonathan J. Gourley. Los Autores Humberto J. Vergara Received the B.Sc. degree in environmental engineering from El Bosque University, Colombia, and the M.Sc. degree in water resources engineering from the University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA. He is currently working toward the Ph.D. degree in the Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science at the University of Oklahoma, Norman. He is currently a Graduate Research Assistant at the Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing (HyDROS; hydro.ou.edu) Laboratory and the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL; http://www.nssl.noaa.gov) in Norman, Oklahoma. His primary field of study is hydrological modeling for flood forecasting. He focuses on model development, ensemble forecasting and data assimilation. for Total Water Level Prediction from the Summit to the Sea." Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 92 (11):1427-1442.
dc.relation/*ref*/Vrugt, J. A., and W. Bouten (2003). "Toward improved identifiability of hydrologic model parameters: The information content of experimental data." Water Resources Research 38 (12).
dc.relation/*ref*/Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. Braak, H. V. Gupta, and B. A. Robinson (2008). "Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?" Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 23 (7):1011-1026.
dc.relation/*ref*/Vrugt, J. A., C. G. H. Diks, H. V. Gupta, W. Bouten, and J. M. Verstraten (2005). "Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation." Water Resources Research 41 (1).
dc.relation/*ref*/Vrugt, J. A., H. V. Gupta, W. Bouten, and S. Sorooshian. 2003. A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis Algorithm for Estimating Posterior Distribution of Watershed Model Parameters. In Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by Q. Duan, S. Sorooshian, H. V. Gupta, A. N. Rousseau and R. Turcotte. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
dc.relation/*ref*/Vrugt, J. A., H. V. Gupta, S. C. Dekker, S. Sorooshian, T. Wagener, and W. Bouten (2006). "Application of stochastic parameter optimization to the Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting model." Journal of Hydrology 325 (1-4):288-307.
dc.relation/*ref*/Vrugt, J. A., and B. A. Robinson (2007). "Treatment of uncertainty using ensemble methods: Comparison of sequential data assimilation and Bayesian model averaging." Water Resources Research 43 (1)
dc.relation/*ref*/Vrugt, J. A., C. J. F. ter Braak, C. G. H. Diks, B. A. Robinson, J. M. Hyman, and D. Higdon (2009). "Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling." International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation 10 (3):273-290.
dc.relation/*ref*/Wagener, T., D. P. Boyle, M. J. Lees, H. S. Wheater, H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 2001. A framework for development and application of hydrological models. Copernicus GmbH.
dc.relation/*ref*/Wang, X. 2009. Advance topics in data assimilation: Ensemble Kalman filter techniques. Norman, OK: Graduate level class METR 6803, The University of Oklahoma.
dc.relation/*ref*/Whitaker, J. S., and T. M. Hamill (2002). "Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations." Monthly Weather Review 130 (7):1913-1925.
dc.relation/*ref*/Willmott, C. J., and K. Matsuura (2005). "Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance." Climate Research 30 (1):79-82.
dc.sourceJournal of Technology; Vol 13 No 1 (2014): Tecnología para hábitos y estilos de vida sostenibles; 9-27en-US
dc.sourceRevista de Tecnología; ##issue.vol## 13 ##issue.no## 1 (2014): Tecnología para hábitos y estilos de vida sostenibles; 9-27es-AR
dc.sourceRevista de Tecnología; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2014): Tecnología para hábitos y estilos de vida sostenibles; 9-27es-ES
dc.source1692-1399
dc.titleImproving Flood Forecasting Skill with the Ensemble Kalman Filteres-AR
dc.titleImproving Flood Forecasting Skill with the Ensemble Kalman Filteres-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem