Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Environmental impacts of paper handouts vs. Online handouts-from a life cycle assessment prospective

dc.creatorArango, Juan
dc.date2017-12-20
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T20:40:32Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T20:40:32Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/RevTec/article/view/2175
dc.identifier10.18270/rt.v15i2.2175
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/10788
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this study was to address the concerns about sustainability between the uses of hard copy reference documents versus online copies. This project presents a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study comparing the production and use of a hard copy handout versus an online handout. For the purpose of this study, paper handouts and online handouts are two different and independent processes. This means that they not only have different outputs but also have different manufacturing stages in order to get to the final result. The scope of this study is “cradle to grave,” starting with the extraction of the raw materials, followed by paper and computer production processes, transportation, product use and disposal/recovery. Results indicate that under the made assumptions, the use of a paper handout has more environmental impacts. At the same time among the evaluated processes, paper production has higher environmental impacts.es-AR
dc.descriptionThe purpose of this study was to address the concerns about sustainability between the uses of hard copy reference documents versus online copies. This project presents a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study comparing the production and use of a hard copy handout versus an online handout. For the purpose of this study, paper handouts and online handouts are two different and independent processes. This means that they not only have different outputs but also have different manufacturing stages in order to get to the final result. The scope of this study is “cradle to grave,” starting with the extraction of the raw materials, followed by paper and computer production processes, transportation, product use and disposal/recovery. Results indicate that under the made assumptions, the use of a paper handout has more environmental impacts. At the same time among the evaluated processes, paper production has higher environmental impacts.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad El Bosquees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/RevTec/article/view/2175/1700
dc.relation/*ref*/Emerson, L.; and Mackay, B.; “A Comparison Between Paper-based and Online Learning in Higher Education”, British Journal of Education Technology, 2011, 42, pp. 727-735.
dc.relation/*ref*/Blinn, B.; Biers, D.W; “Searching Hard-Copy (Paper) Vs. Electronic (CRT) Documents: Role of the Experience, Amount of Text Displayed and Book Metaphor”, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society Annual Meeting, 1999, 43, pp. 447-451.
dc.relation/*ref*/Mirchin, N.; Peled, A.; Baal-Zedaka, I.; Margolin, R.; Zagon, M.; Lapsker, I.; Verdyan A.; and Azoulay J.; “Photodeposited diffractive optical elements of computer generated masks”, Applied Surface Science, 2005, 248, pp.509-513.
dc.relation/*ref*/Duan, H.; Eugster, M.; Hischier, R.; Streicher- Porte, M.; and Li. J.; “Life Cycle Assessment Study of a Chinese Desktop Personal Computer”, Science of the Total Environment, 2009, 407, pp. 1755-1764.
dc.relation/*ref*/Manda, B.M.; Block, K.; Patel, M.K., “Innovations in Papermaking: An LCA of Printing and Writing Paper from Conventional and High Yield Pulp”, Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 439, pp. 307-320.
dc.relation/*ref*/Perez-Belis, V.; Bovea, M.D.; and Ibanez-Fores, V.; “An In-depth Literature Review of the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Context: Trends and Evolution”, The Journal of the International Solid Waste and Public Cleansing Association, 2015, 33, pp. 3-29.
dc.relation/*ref*/Kim, J.; and Rohmer, S.; “Electronic Billing vs. Paper Billing: Dematerialization, Energy Consumption and Environmental Impacts”, Electronics Goes Green, 2012, 1, pp. 1-4.
dc.relation/*ref*/Shea, K.O.; “Make Amazing Paper- The Story of Paper from Tree to Sheet”, New Moon Girls, 2010, 17, pp.16-17.
dc.relation/*ref*/Chakraborty, D.; and Joyashree, D.; “Ecological Footprint of Paperboard and Paper Production Unit in India”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2015, 17, pp. 909-921.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hart, A.; Clift, R.; Riddlestone, S., and Buntin, J.; “Use of Life Cycle Assessment to Develop Industrial Ecologies-A Case Study Graphics Paper”, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2005, 83, pp. 359-363.
dc.relation/*ref*/Gemechu, E.D.; Butnar, I.; Llop, M.; and Castells, F.; “Environmental Tax on Products and Services Based on their Carbon Footprint: A Case Study of the Pulp and Paper Sector”, Energy Policy, 2012, 50, pp. 336-344.
dc.relation/*ref*/Gonzales-Garcia, S.; Ibarren, D.; Susmozas, A., Defour, J., and Murphy, R.J.; “Life Cycle Assessment of two Bioenergy Systems Involving Salix Spp.: Bioethanol Production and Power Generation”, Applied Energy, 2012, 95, pp. 111-122.
dc.relation/*ref*/Wallot, S.; Hollis, G.; and Rooij, M.V.; “Connected Text Reading and Differences in Text Reading Fluency in Adult Readers”, PLoS ONE, 2013, 8, pp.1-23.
dc.relation/*ref*/Deng, H.; Wang, F.; Liang W.B.; “A Low-Cost OMR Solution for Educational Applications”, Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications, 2008, pp. 967-970.
dc.relation/*ref*/Hong, J.; and Li, X.; “Environmental assessment of recycled printing and writing paper: A case study in China”, Waste Treatment, 2012, 32, pp. 264-270.
dc.relation/*ref*/Zeide, B.; “A Relationship between Size of Trees and their Number”, Forest Ecology and Management, 1995, 72, pp. 265-272.
dc.relation/*ref*/Krishnamurthy, S.; “Bio-Methylation and Environmental Transport of Metals (Chemistry and the Environment)”, Journal of Chemical Education, 1992, 69, pp. 347-351.
dc.relation/*ref*/Lim, S.R; and Schoenung, J.M.; “Human health and ecological toxicity potentials due to heavy metal content in waste electronic devices with flat panel displays”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 177, pp. 251-259.
dc.relation/*ref*/Gurkin, K., “Investigation of Material Composite Li3V2(PO4)3 with LiMn2-xNixO4 for Li-ion Batteries”. Dissertation, Northeaster University, Boston, MA, 2010.
dc.relation/*ref*/Jang, Y.C.; Townsend T.; and Yoon, H.; “Evaluation of metal leaching from end-of-life laptop computers using the TCLP and other standard leaching tests”, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on, IEEE, 2006, pp. 309-314
dc.relation/*ref*/Bellieni, C.; Pinto, I.; Bogi, A.; Zoppetti, N.; Andreuccetti, D.; and Buonocore, G.; “Exposure to electromagnetic fields from laptop use of “laptop” computers.”, Archives of environmental & occupational health, 2012, 67, pp.31-36.
dc.relation/*ref*/Brodi, D.; and Amelio, A.; “Classification of the Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Field Radiation Measurement from the Laptop Computers”, Measurement Science Review, 2015, 15, pp. 202-209.
dc.relation/*ref*/Ervasti, I.; Miranda, R.; Kauranen, I.; “Paper Recycling Framework the “Wheel of Fiber”, Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 17, pp. 35-44.
dc.relation/*ref*/Fricker, A.; Thompson, R.; Manning, A., “Novel Solutions to the New Problems in Paper Deinking” Pigment & Resin Technology, 2007, 36, pp. 141-152.
dc.relation/*ref*/Kutucuoglu, K.; Arikan, S.; Isil, F.; and Aytekin, T., “Consumption, Consumer Culture and Consumer Society”, Jurnalul Practicolor Comunitare, 2013, 1, pp. 233-235.
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2017 Journal of Technologyes-ES
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceJournal of Technology; Vol 15 No 2 (2016): Turismo Sustentableen-US
dc.sourceRevista de Tecnología; ##issue.vol## 15 ##issue.no## 2 (2016): Turismo Sustentablees-AR
dc.sourceRevista de Tecnología; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2016): Turismo Sustentablees-ES
dc.source1692-1399
dc.subjectLife cycle Assessmentes-ES
dc.subjectLife Cycle Inventaryes-ES
dc.subjectPaper Productiones-ES
dc.subjectElectronic Productiones-ES
dc.titleEnvironmental impacts of paper handouts vs. Online handouts-from a life cycle assessment prospectivees-AR
dc.titleEnvironmental impacts of paper handouts vs. Online handouts-from a life cycle assessment prospectivees-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem