¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico

Lombardi, Olimpia

dc.creator	Lombardi, Olimpia
dc.date	2016-04-27
dc.date.accessioned	2020-08-21T20:50:30Z
dc.date.available	2020-08-21T20:50:30Z
dc.identifier	https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1645
dc.identifier	10.18270/rcfc.v13i26.1645
dc.identifier.uri	http://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/11121
dc.description	Si bien la química como disciplina tiene una larguísima historia, los impresionanteséxitos de la mecánica cuántica en el siglo XX han conducido a concebirla como unarama de la física sobre la base de un enfoque netamente reduccionista. El propósito delpresente trabajo consiste en abordar el tema de la relación entre química y física tal comoha sido discutido en la reciente filosofía de la química. El objetivo final, en sintonía conartículos previos, es defender la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico desde unaperspectiva anti-reduccionista, tomando en consideración ciertas críticas directas a talestrabajos formuladas durante los últimos años.	es-AR
dc.description	Si bien la química como disciplina tiene una larguísima historia, los impresionanteséxitos de la mecánica cuántica en el siglo XX han conducido a concebirla como unarama de la física sobre la base de un enfoque netamente reduccionista. El propósito delpresente trabajo consiste en abordar el tema de la relación entre química y física tal comoha sido discutido en la reciente filosofía de la química. El objetivo final, en sintonía conartículos previos, es defender la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico desde unaperspectiva anti-reduccionista, tomando en consideración ciertas críticas directas a talestrabajos formuladas durante los últimos años.	es-ES
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.language	spa
dc.publisher	Universidad El Bosque	es-ES
dc.relation	https://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1645/1239
dc.relation	10.18270/rcfc.v13i26.1645.g1239
dc.relation	/ref/Amann, A. “Must a molecule have a shape?”. South African Journal of Chemistry 45 (1992): 29-38. Baird, D., Scerri, E. & McIntyre, L., Eds. Philosophy of Chemistry: Synthesis of a New Discipline. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 242. Benfey, T. “Reflections on the philosophy of chemistry and a rallying call for our discipline”. Foundations of Chemistry 2 (2000): 195-205. Bishop, R. & Atmanspacher, H. “Contextual emergence in the description of properties”. Foundations of Physics 36 (2006): 1753-1777. Castagnino, M. & Lombardi, O. “Self-induced decoherence: A new approach”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2004): 73-107. Cat, J. “The unity of science”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E. N. Zalta. 2007. <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/scientific- unity/>. Chamizo, J. A. “The public image of chemistry”. Educacion Química 22 (2011): 320-331. Daintith, J. Dictionary of Chemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Dirac, P. A. M. “Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems”. Proceedings of the Royal Society A338 (1929): 714-733. Emerson, K. “The quantum mechanical explanation of the periodic system”. Journal of Chemical Education 76 (1999): 1189. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”. Physical Review 47 (1935): 777-780. Estany, A. “¿Es posible una filosofía de la química?”. Investigación y Ciencia 420 (2011 septiembre): 52-53. French, S. & Krause, D. Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical and Formal Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Hacking, I. Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. Hawkes, S. J. “Unsaturated bonds should not be represented in introductory chemistry by orbital overlap”. Chemistry. Bulgarian Journal of Chemical Education 16 (2007): 90-91. Hendry, R. “Models and approximations in quantum chemistry”. Idealization IX: Idealization in Contemporary Physics. Ed. N. Shanks. Amsterdam: Rodopi, (1998): 123-42. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 63. —. “Is there downwards causation in chemistry?”. Philosophy of chemistry: synthesis of a new discipline. Berlin: Springer (2006): 173-189. —. “Ontological reduction and molecular structure”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 183-191. Hettema, H. Reducing Chemistry to Physics: Limits, Models, Consequences. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, 2012. Hoffmann, R. “What might philosophy of science look like if chemists built it?”. Synthese 155 (2007): 321-336. Humphreys, C. J. “Electron seen in orbit”. Nature 401 (1999): 49-52. Itatani, J., Levesque, J., Zeidler, D., Niikura, H., Pépin, H., Kieffer, J. C., Corkum, P. B. & Villeneuve, D. M. “Tomographic imaging of molecular orbitals”. Nature 432 (2004): 867-871. Jacoby, M. “Picture-perfect orbitals”. Chemical & Engineering News 77 (1999): 8. Kemeny, J. G. & Oppenheim, P. “On reduction”. Philosophical Studies 7 (1956): 6-19. Kochen, S. & Specker, E. “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics”. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17 (1967): 59-87. Koolage, W. J. & Hall, R. “Chemical action: what is it, and why does it really matter?”. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (2011): 1401-1417. Labarca, M. & Lombardi, O. “Irreversibilidad y pluralismo ontológico”. Scientiae Studia 5 (2007): 139-167. —. “The end of the dream of unity”. Current Science 94 (2008): 438-439. —. “Why orbitals do not exist?”. Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2010): 149-157. —. “On the autonomous existence of chemical entities”. Current Physical Chemistry 1 (2011): 69-75. Le Poidevin, R. “Missing elements and missing premises: A combinatorial arguments for the ontological reduction of chemistry”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2005): 117-134. Lombardi, O. “Determinism, internalism and objectivity”. Between Chance and Choice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Determinism. Eds. H. Atmanspacher & R. Bishop. Thorverton: Imprint-Academic, 2002. Lombardi, O. & Labarca, M. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical world”. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005): 125-148. —. “The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: A response to Needham”. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2006): 81-92. Lombardi, O. & Martínez González, J. C. “Entre mecánica cuántica y estructuras químicas: ¿a qué refiere la química cuántica?”, Scientiae Studia 10 (2012): 649-670. Lombardi, O. & Pérez Ransanz, A. R. “Lenguaje, ontología y relaciones interteóricas: en favor de un genuino pluralismo ontológico”. Revista Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura 187 (2011): 43-52. —. Los Múltiples Mundos de la Ciencia. Un Realismo Pluralista y su Aplicación a la Filosofía de la Física. México: UNAM-Siglo XXI, 2012. Luisi, P. L. “Emergence in chemistry: Chemistry as the embodiment of emergence”. Foundations of Chemistry 4 (2002): 183-200. Manafu, A. “Internal realism and the problem of ontological autonomy: A critical note on Lombardi and Labarca”. Foundations of Chemistry 15 (2012): 225-228. McIntyre, L. “The philosophy of chemistry: ten years later”. Synthese 155 (2007a): 291-292. —. “Emergence and reduction in chemistry: ontological or epistemological concepts?”. Synthese 155 (2007b): 337-343. Mulder, P. “On the alleged non-existence of orbitals”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 178-182. —. “Are orbitals observable?”. Hyle - International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 17 (2011): 24-35. Mulliken, R. S. Life of a Scientist. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986. Nagel, E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961. Needham, P. “Ontological reduction: A comment on Lombardi-Labarca”. Foundations of Chemistry 8 (2006): 73-80. —. “Nagel’s analysis of reduction: Comments in defense as well as critique”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2010): 163-170. Nelson, P. “How do electrons get across nodes?”. Journal of Chemical Education 67 (1990): 643-647. Neurath, O. “Pseudorracionalismo de la falsación”. Redes 10 (2002): 87-118. Trad. de “Pseudorationalism of falsification”. 1935. Philosophical Papers 1913-1946. Ed. R. Cohen y M. Neurath. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983. 121-131. Newman, M. “Chemical supervenience”. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2008): 49-62. Nye, M. J. From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry - Dynamics of Matter and Dynamics of Disciplines 1800-1950. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993. Pagliaro, P. “On shapes, molecules and models: an insight into chemical methodology”. European Journal of Chemistry 1 (2010): 276-281. Pascual, J. I., Gómez-Herrero, J., Rogero, C., Baró, A. M., Sánchez-Portal, D., Artacho, E., Ordejón, P. & Sovvler, J. M. “Seeing molecular orbitals”. Chemical Physical Letters 321 (2000): 78-82. Pérez Ransanz, A. R. Kuhn y el Cambio Científico. México: Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1999. Primas, H. Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism. Berlin: Springer, 1983. —. “Hierarchic quantum descriptions and their associated ontologies”. Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1994. Ed. K. V. Laurikainen, C. Montonen y K. Sunnarborg. Gif-sur-Yvette: Editions Frontières, 1994. —. “Emergence in exact natural sciences”. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica 91 (1998): 83-98. Putnam, H. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. Richman, R. “In defense of quantum numbers”. Journal of Chemical Education 76 (1999a): 608. —. “The use of one-electron quantum numbers to describe polyatomic systems”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999b): 175-83. Rohrlich, F. “Pluralistic ontology and theory reduction in the physical sciences”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (1988): 295-312. Scerri, E. “The electronic configuration model, quantum mechanics and reduction”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (1991): 309-25. —. “Has chemistry been at least approximately reduced to quantum mechanics?”. PSA 1994. Vol. 1. Eds. D. Hull, M. Forbes & R. Burian. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 1994. 160-170. —. “The periodic table and the electron”. American Scientist 85 (1997): 546-553. —. “The failure of reduction and how to resist disunity of the sciences in the context of chemical education”. Science & Education 9 (2000a): 405-425. —. “Realism, reduction and the ‘intermediate position’”. Of Minds and Molecules. New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. Eds. N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000b. 51-72. —. “Have orbitals really been observed?”. Journal of Chemical Education 77 (2000c): 1492-1494. —. “The recently claimed observation of atomic orbitals and some related philosophical issues”. Philosophy of Science 68 (2001): S76-S88. —. “Have orbitals really been observed? (author reply)”. Journal of Chemical Education 79 (2002): 210. —. “Just how ab initio is ab initio quantum chemistry?”. Foundations of Chemistry 6 (2004): 93-116. —. “Editorial 20”. Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005a): 119-123. —. “Some aspects of the metaphysics of chemistry and the nature of the elements”, Hyle - International Journal for the Philosophy of Chemistry 11 (2005b): 127-145. —. “Normative and descriptive philosophy of science and the role of chemistry”. Baird, Scerri & McIntyre. 119-128. —. “The ambiguity of reduction”. Hyle - International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 13 (2007): 67-81. —. “General introduction to the papers”. Collected Papers on Philosophy of Chemistry. Londres: Imperial College Press, 2008a. 1-22. —. “Philosophy of chemistry, reduction, emergence and chemical education”. Advances in Teaching Physical Chemistry. Eds. M. Ellison & T. Schoolcraft. Washington: American Chemical Society, 2008b. 59-72. Scerri, E. & McIntyre, L. “The case for the philosophy of chemistry”. Synthese 111 (1997): 213-232. Schuster, P. “‘Less is more’ and the art of modeling complex phenomena: simplification may but need not be the key to handle large networks”. Complexity 11 (2005): 11-13. Schwarz, W. H. E. & Wang, S. G. “Some solved problems of the periodic system of chemical elements”. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 110 (2010): 1455-1465. Sklar, L. Physics and Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Ströhle, A. “Molecularization in nutritional science: a view from philosophy of science”. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 54 (2010): 1385-1404. Tinoco Jr. I., Sauer, K., Wang, J. C. y Puglisi, J. D. Physical Chemistry - Principles and Applications in Biological Sciences. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002. Torretti, R. “El realismo científico y la ciencia como es”. Escritos Filosóficos 1986-2006. Santiago de Chile: Universidad Diego Portales, 2007. 75-98. Trad. de “Scientific realism and scientific practice”. The Reality of the Unobservable: Observability, Unobservability and their Impact on the Issue of Scientific Realism. Ed. E. Agazzi & M. Pauri. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000. 113-122. —. Manuel Kant. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales, 2005. Van Brakel, J. “Chemistry as the science of the transformation of substances”. Synthese 111 (1997): 253-282. —. Philosophy of Chemistry. Between the Manifest and the Scientific Image. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2000a. —. “The nature of chemical substances”. Of Minds and Molecules. New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. Eds. N. Bhushan & S. Rosenfeld. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000b. 162-184. Vancik, H. “Opus magnum: An outline for the philosophy of chemistry”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999): 242-256. Vemulapalli, G. K. y Byerly, H. “Remnants of reductionism”. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1999): 17-41. Vesterinen, V. M. & Aksela, M. “A novel course of chemistry as a scientific discipline: how do prospective perceive nature of chemistry through visits to research groups”. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 10 (2009): 132-141. —. “Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in nordic upper secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry”. Science & Education 22 (2013): 1839-1855. —. “Design of chemistry teacher education course on nature of science”. Science & Education 22 (2013): 2193-2225. Vihalemm, R. “The autonomy of chemistry: old and new problems”. Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2010): 97-107. Wang, S. G. & Schwarz, W. H. E. “On closed-shell interactions, polar covalences, d shell holes, and direct images of orbitals: the case of Cuprite”. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 39 (2000): 1757-1762. —. “PSE - Icon of chemistry: The periodic system of chemical elements in the new century”. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 48 (2009): 3404-3415. Wasserman, E. & Schaefer, H. F. “Methylene geometry”. Science 233 (1986): 829. Wilson, M. “John Earman’s A Primer on Determinism”. Philosophy of Science 56 (1989): 502-532. Woolley, R. G. “Must a molecule have a shape?”. American Chemical Society 100 (1978): 1073-78. —. “Natural optical activity and the molecular hypothesis”. Structure and Bonding 52 (1982): 1-35. Yam, P. “Seeing the bonds”. Scientific American 281 (1999): 28. Zuo, J. M., Kim, M., O’Keefe, M. & Spence, J. C. H. “Direct observation of d-orbital holes and Cu-Cu Bonding in Cu2O”. Nature 401 (1999): 49-52. Zurer, P. “Chemistry’s top five achievements”. Chemical & Engineering News 77 (1999): 38-40.
dc.rights	Derechos de autor 2016 Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia	es-ES
dc.source	Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol 13 No 26 (2013): Sección Especial: Filosofía de la Química	en-US
dc.source	Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; ##issue.vol## 13 ##issue.no## 26 (2013): Sección Especial: Filosofía de la Química	es-AR
dc.source	Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol. 13 Núm. 26 (2013): Sección Especial: Filosofía de la Química	es-ES
dc.source	2463-1159
dc.source	0124-4620
dc.title	¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico	es-AR
dc.title	¿Acerca de qué nos habla la química? Nuevos argumentos en favor de la autonomía ontológica del mundo químico	es-ES
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros	Tamaño	Formato	Ver
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia [152]

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem