Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Conventionality and Relationality in Relativistic Space-Time

Conventionality and Relationality in Relativistic Space-Time;
Conventionality and Relationality in Relativistic Space-Time

dc.creatorAlemañ Berenguer, Rafael Andrés
dc.date2012-06-30
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T20:50:35Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T20:50:35Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1693
dc.identifier10.18270/rcfc.v12i24.1693
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/11138
dc.descriptionThe actual information concerning the geometric structure of the world, i.e. thestructure of spacetime that is conveyed to us through the theory of general relativity,is discussed. Different proposals related to several philosophical schools (coventionalism,empiricism, etc.) are dealt with. The conclusion —still open to furtherdebate— seems to point to the fact that although space-time has an objective existence,its metric shows a relational or non-absolute character.en-US
dc.descriptionThe actual information concerning the geometric structure of the world, i.e. thestructure of spacetime that is conveyed to us through the theory of general relativity,is discussed. Different proposals related to several philosophical schools (coventionalism,empiricism, etc.) are dealt with. The conclusion —still open to furtherdebate— seems to point to the fact that although space-time has an objective existence,its metric shows a relational or non-absolute character.es-AR
dc.descriptionThe actual information concerning the geometric structure of the world, i.e. thestructure of spacetime that is conveyed to us through the theory of general relativity,is discussed. Different proposals related to several philosophical schools (coventionalism,empiricism, etc.) are dealt with. The conclusion —still open to furtherdebate— seems to point to the fact that although space-time has an objective existence,its metric shows a relational or non-absolute character.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad El Bosquees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/1693/1269
dc.relation10.18270/rcfc.v12i24.1693.g1269
dc.relation/*ref*/Anderson, J. L. Principles of Relativity Physics. New York: Academic Press, 1967. Arkani-Hamed, N., Cohen, A. & Georgi, H. “(De)constructing Dimensions”. Physical Review Letters, 86 (2001): 4757-4761. Callender, C., Huggett, H. Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Cambridge (U.K.): Cambridge University Press, 2001. Cohen, R. S., & Seeger, R. J. Ernst Mach - Physicist and Philosopher. Reidel: Dordrecht, 1970. Earman, J. “Who’s Afraid of Absolute Space”. Australian Journal of Philosphy. vol. 48 (1970): 287-299. —. Glymour, N. & Stachel, J. J. Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977. Erlich, G. The Shape of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. Glymour, E. “The Epistemology of Geometry”. Noûs, 11 (1977): 227-235. Graves, J. C. The Conceptual Foundations of Contemporary Relativity Theory. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press, 1971. Grünbaum, A. “Geometrodynarnics and Ontology”. Journal of Philosophy, 70 (1973): 775-789. Isham, C. J. “Structural problems facing quantum gravity theory”. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation. Eds. Francaviglia, M., Longhi, G., Lusanna, L., & Sorace, E. Singapore: World Scientific, 1997, 167-209. Loll, R. & Westra, W. “Space-time foam in 2D and the sum over topologies”. Acta Phys. Polon. B, 34 (2003): 4997-5008. Poincaré, H. Science and Hypothesis. New York: Dover, 1952. —. The Value of Science. New York: Dover, 1956. —. Last Thoughts. New York: Dover, 1963. Reichenbach, H. The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1956. —. The Philosophy of Space and Time. New York: Dover, 1958. Rovelli, C. Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Sklar, L. Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974. Torretti, R. Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré. Reidel: Dordrecht, 1978.
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2016 Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaes-ES
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol 12 No 24 (2012): Número Especial: Filosofía de la Físicaen-US
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; ##issue.vol## 12 ##issue.no## 24 (2012): Número Especial: Filosofía de la Físicaes-AR
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol. 12 Núm. 24 (2012): Número Especial: Filosofía de la Físicaes-ES
dc.source2463-1159
dc.source0124-4620
dc.titleConventionality and Relationality in Relativistic Space-Timeen-US
dc.titleConventionality and Relationality in Relativistic Space-Timees-AR
dc.titleConventionality and Relationality in Relativistic Space-Timees-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem