Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

On the Ontological Status of Spacetime. A Response to Structural Realism

Sobre el estatus ontológico del espaciotiempo. Una respuesta al realismo estructural.

dc.creatorCastrejón, Gilberto
dc.date2020-04-03
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T20:50:52Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T20:50:52Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/2803
dc.identifier10.18270/rcfc.v19i39.2803
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/11224
dc.descriptionThe problem of realism about spacetime revolves around whether it is a substance or a relationship between substances. For the ontic structural realism: "spacetime is a real structure embodied in the world", where the mathematical structure has the preeminence, hence its ontological status. In this paper I set up a response to this structural realism, arguing that the idea of a “metaphysics of structures”, which gives ontological primacy to structures over objects, fails to avoid the inconveniences of some basic aspects of traditional realism over spacetime.en-US
dc.descriptionEl problema del realismo sobre el espaciotiempo gira en torno de si es una substancia o una relación entre substancias. Para el realismo estructural óntico: “el espaciotiempo es una estructura real encarnada en el mundo”, donde la preeminencia la tiene la estructura matemática, de aquí su estatus ontológico. En este artículo configuro una respuesta a dicho realismo estructural, argumentando que la idea de una “metafísica de estructuras”, que da primacía ontológica a las estructuras por sobre los objetos, no logra evitar los inconvenientes de algunos aspectos básicos del realismo tradicional sobre el espaciotiempo.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad El Bosquees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/rcfc/article/view/2803/2692
dc.relation/*ref*/Allori, Valia. “Primitive Ontology and the Structure of Fundamental Physical Theories”. The Wave Function. Essays on the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. Eds. Alyssa Ney y David Z. Albert. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. 58-75. Bain, Jonathan. “Spacetime Structuralism”. The Ontology of Spacetime. Ed. Dennis Dieks. The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2006. 37-65. _____. “Category-theoretic Structure and Radical Ontic Structural Realism”. Synthese 190 (2013): 1621-1635. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9896-6>. Becker Arenhart, Jonas R. y Bueno, Otávio. “Structural Realism and the Nature of Structure”. Euro. Jnl. Phil. Sci. 5 (2015): 111–139. Borge, Bruno. “¿Qué es el realismo estructural óntico?: una aproximación al debate actual sobre el realismo científico”. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia 13.27 (2013): 149-175. <https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v13i27.1636>. _____. “Realismo estructural óntico y estructuras físicas”. Revista Internacional de Filosofía Campinas 4.2 (2017): 71-97. <https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2017.v40n2.bb>. Brading, Katherine y Elena Castellani, eds. Symmetries in Physics. Philosophical Reflections. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Brading, Katherine y Landry, Elaine. “Scientific Structuralism: Presentation and Representation”. Philosophy of Science 73 (2006): 571-581. Bueno, Octavio. “Structural Empiricism, Again”. Scientific Structuralism. Eds. P. Bokulich y A. Bokulich. Springer Science+Business Media B.V, 2010. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9597-8_5>. Butterfield, Jeremy. “The Hole Truth”. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40.1 (1989): 1-28. Calvo Vélez, David. “Crítica del isomorfismo de los modelos estructuralistas”. Teorema 24.3 (2006): 57-72. Carnap, Rudolf. “Der Raum. Ein Beitrag zur Wissenschafttlehere”. Kant Studien Ergänzungshefte 56 (1922). Cao, Tian Yu. “Can We Dissolve Physical Entities into Mathematical Structures?” Synthese 136.1 (2003): 57-71. Chakravartty, Anja. “The Structuralist Conception of Objects”. Philosophy of Science 70.5 (2003): 867-878. Dieks, Dennis, ed. The Ontology of Spacetime. The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2006. _____. The Ontology of Spacetime II. The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2008. DiSalle, Robert. Understanding Space-Time. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Dorato, Mauro. “Substantivalism, Relacionism and Structural Spacetime Realism”. Foundations of Physics 30 (2000): 1605-1628. _____. “Is Structural Spacetime Realism Relationism in Disguise? The Supererogatory Nature of the Substantivalism/Relationism Debate”. The Ontology of Spacetime II. Ed. Dennis Dieks. The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2008.17-38. Earman, John. World enough and Space-Time. Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1989. _____. “The Implications of General Covariance for the Ontology and Ideology of Spacetime”. The Ontology of Spacetime. Ed. Dennis Dieks. The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2006. 3-23. Earman, John y John Norton. “What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Argument”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4.38 (1987): 515. Einstein, Albert. “Fundamentos de la teoría de la relatividad general”. Einstein: obra esencial. Barcelona: Crítica, 2005. Esfeld, Michael y Vincent Lam. “Moderate Structural Realism about Spacetime”. Synthese 160 (2008): 27-46. French, Steven. The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. French, Steven y James Ladyman. “Remodeling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure”. Synthese 136.1 (2003): 31-56. Friedman, Michael. Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987. Geroch, R. “Einstein algebras”. Communications in Mathematical Physics 26.1 (1972): 271-275. Hacyan, Shahen. “Geometry as an Object of Experience: Kant and the Missed Debate between Poincaré and Einstein”. European Journal of Physics 30.1 (2007): 337-350. Hacking, Ian. Representar e intervenir. México: Paidós, 1996. Heller, Michael. “Einstein Algebras and General Relativity”. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 31.2 (1992): 277-288. Hoefer, Carl. “The Metaphysics of Spacetime Substantivalism”. Journal of Philosophy 93.1 (1996): 5-27. Horwich, Paul. “Three Forms of Realism”. Synthese 51.1 (1982): 181-201. Huggett, Nick. Space from Zeno to Einstein. United States of America: The MIT Press, 1999. Jones, Roger. “Realism about what?” Philosophy of Science 58 (1991): 185-202. Ladyman, James. “What is Structural Realism?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29 (1998): 409-424. _____. “On the Identity and Diversity of Objects in a Structure”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81 (2007): 45-61. Ladyman, James, et ál. Every Thing Must Go. Metaphysics Naturalized. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. Lam, Vincent y Christian Wüthrich. “No Categorial Support for Radical Ontic Structural Realism”. British Journal of Philosophy of Science 66 (2015): 605-634. Madrid-Casado, C. “Do Mathematical Models Represent the World? The Case of Quantum Mathematical Models”. Nature and Life. Philosophical Essays and Physics and Biology. Ed. J. L. González Recio. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 2009. 67-89. Maudlin, Tim. “The Essence of Space-Time”. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association Meetings. Vol. 2. Comps. A. Fine y J. Leplin. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association, 1989. _____. Filosofía de la física I. Espacio y tiempo. México: FCE, 2014. Montesinos, Merced. “El problema del tiempo en la relatividad general”. Revista Mexicana de Física S 53.2 (2007): 68-74. Nerlich, Graham. “Holes in the Hole Argument”. What Spacetime Explains? New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 206-224. Poincaré, Henri. Science and Hypothesis. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1952. Pooley, Oliver. “Substantivalist and Relationalist Approaches to Spacetime”. Philosophy of Physics. Ed. Robert Batterman. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. 522-586. Psillos, Stathis. “Is Structural Realism the Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica 49 (1995): 15-46. _____. “Is Structural Realism Possible?” Philosophy of Science 68 (2001): 513-524. Rickles, Dean. Symmetry, Structure and Spacetime. The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2008. Redhead, Michael. “The Interpretation of Gauge Symmetry”. Symmetries in Physics Philosophical Reflections. Eds. K. Brading y E. Castellani. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 124-139. Rivadulla, Andrés. “Two Dogmas of Structural Realism. A Confirmation of Philosophical Death Foretold”. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 42.124 (2010): 3-29. Romero, Gustavo E. “The Ontology of General Relativity”. General Relativity and Gravitation. Eds. M. Novello y S. E. Pérez Bergliaffa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 1-15. Rosenstock, Sarita, et ál. “On Einstein Algebras and Relativistic Spacetimes”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (2015): 309-316. Rovelli, Carlo. “The Disappearance of Space and Time”. The Ontology of Spacetime. Ed. Dennis Dieks. The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2008. 25-36. Rynasiewicz, Robert. “Absolute versus Relational Space-Time: An Outmoded Debate?” Journal of Philosophy 93.6 (1996): 279-306. Sklar, Lawrence. Space, Time and Spacetime. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977. Sneed, John. The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1971. Stachel, John. “The Meaning of General Covariance”. Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays of the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum. Eds. John Earman et ál. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993. 129-162. Szabó, Lázló E. “Meaning, Truth, and Physics”. Making it Formally Explicit. European Studies in Philosophy of Science 6. Eds. G. Hofer-Szabó y L.Wronski. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing, 2017. 1-16. Tegmark, M. “The Mathematical Universe”. Foundations of Physics 38 (2008): 101– 150. Utiyama, Ruy. “Invariant Theoretical Interpretation of Interaction”. Physical Review 5.101 (1956): 1597-1607. <https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.101.1597>. Van Fraassen, B. C. “Representation: The Problem for Structuralism”. Philosophy of Science 73.5 (2006): 536-547. Wald, Robert M. General Relativity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1984. Will, C. M. Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Worral, John. “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds”. Dialectica 43 (1989): 99- 124. Wüthrich, Christian. “Challenging the Spacetime Structuralist”. Philosophy of Science 76 (2009): 1039-1051.
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2019 Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Cienciaes-ES
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol 19 No 39 (2019): Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; 43-84en-US
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; ##issue.vol## 19 ##issue.no## 39 (2019): Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; 43-84es-AR
dc.sourceRevista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; Vol. 19 Núm. 39 (2019): Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia; 43-84es-ES
dc.source2463-1159
dc.source0124-4620
dc.source10.18270/rcfc.v19i39
dc.subjectRealismo estructural, relatividad general, espaciotiempo, substancialismo, relacionismo.es-ES
dc.titleOn the Ontological Status of Spacetime. A Response to Structural Realismen-US
dc.titleSobre el estatus ontológico del espaciotiempo. Una respuesta al realismo estructural.es-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem