Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

A phantom-based study for assessing the error and uncertainty of a neuronavigation system

Evaluación del error y la incertidumbre de un sistema de neuronavegación, estudio basado en una estructura acrílica

dc.creatorIzquierdo-Cifuentes, Natalia
dc.creatorDaza-Santacoloma, Genaro
dc.creatorSerna-Serna, Walter
dc.date2017-02-21
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-18T21:06:42Z
dc.date.available2021-03-18T21:06:42Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/578
dc.identifier10.22430/22565337.578
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/11670
dc.descriptionThis document describes a calibration protocol with the intention to introduce a guide to standardize the metrological vocabulary among manufacturers of image-guided surgery systems. Two stages were developed to measure the errors and estimate the uncertainty of a neuronavigator in different situations, on the first one it was determined a mechanical error on a virtual model of an acrylic phantom, on the second it was determined a coordinate error on the computerized axial tomography scan of the same phantom. Ten standard coordinates of the phantom were compared with the coordinates generated by the NeuroCPS. After measurement model was established, there were identified the sources of uncertainty and the data was processed according the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.en-US
dc.descriptionEste documento describe un protocolo de calibración con el objetivo de introducir una guía que estandarice el vocabulario metrológico entre los fabricantes de sistemas de cirugía guiada por imágenes. Se desarrollaron dos etapas para medir los errores y estimar la incertidumbre de un neuronavegador en diferentes situaciones, en la primera se determinó un error mecánico en un modelo virtual de una estructura acrílica, en la segunda se determinó un error de coordenadas sobre imágenes de tomografía axial computarizada de la misma estructura. Diez coordenadas de referencia de la estructura acrílica se compararon con las coordenadas generadas por el neuronavegador. Después de establecer el modelo de medición, fueron identificadas las fuentes de incertidumbre, los datos se procesaron de acuerdo a la guía para la expresión de la incertidumbre de medida.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (ITM)en-US
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/578/605
dc.relation/*ref*/G. Unsgaard, S. Ommedal, T. Muller, A. Gronningsaeter, and T. A. Nagelhus Hernes, “Neuronavigation by intraoperative three-dimensional ultrasound: initial experience during brain tumor resection.,” Neurosurgery, vol. 50, no. 4, p. 804–12; discussion 812, Apr. 2002. [2] L. H. Stieglitz, J. Fichtner, R. Andres, P. Schucht, A.-K. Krähenbühl, A. Raabe, and J. Beck, “The silent loss of neuronavigation accuracy: a systematic retrospective analysis of factors influencing the mismatch of frameless stereotactic systems in cranial neurosurgery.,” Neurosurgery, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 796–807, May 2013. [3] K. Cleary and T. M. Peters, “Image-Guided Interventions: Technology Review and Clinical Applications,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 119–142, Jul. 2010. [4] P. Grunert, K. Darabi, J. Espinosa, and R. Filippi, “Computer-aided navigation in neurosurgery,” Neurosurg. Rev., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 73–99, May 2003. [5] E. A. Benardete, M. A. Leonard, and H. L. Weiner, “Comparison of frameless stereotactic systems: accuracy, precision, and applications,” Neurosurgery, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1409–1416, 2001. [6] S. Poggi, S. Pallotta, S. Russo, P. Gallina, A. Torresin, and M. Bucciolini, “Neuronavigation accuracy dependence on CT and MR imaging parameters: a phantom-based study,” Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 48, no. 14, pp. 2199–2216, Jul. 2003. [7] R. F. Labadie, B. M. Davis, and J. M. Fitzpatrick, “Image-guided surgery: what is the accuracy?,” Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 2005. [8] M. Cartellieri, J. Kremser, and F. Vorbeck, “Comparison of different 3D navigation systems by a clinical ‘user,’” Eur. Arch. oto-rhino-laryngology, vol. 258, no. 1, pp. 38–41, 2001. [9] R. R. Shamir, L. Joskowicz, S. Spektor, and Y. Shoshan, “Localization and registration accuracy in image guided neurosurgery: a clinical study,” Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2009. [10] H. Abbasi, S. Hariri, D. Martin, D. Kim, J. Adler, G. Steinberg, and R. Shahidi, “A Comparative Statistical Error Analysis of Neuronavigation Systems in a Clinical Setting,” in International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2000, pp. 144–153. [11] S. Barszcz, M. Roszkowski, P. Daszkiewicz, E. Jurkiewicz, and A. Maryniak, “Accuracy of intraoperative registration during electromagnetic neuronavigation in intracranial procedures performed in children.,” Neurol. Neurochir. Pol., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 122–127, 2006. [12] M. Ammirati, J. D. Gross, G. Ammirati, and S. Dugan, “Comparison of registration accuracy of skin-and bone-implanted fiducials for frameless stereotaxis of the brain: a prospective study,” Skull Base, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 125, 2002. [13] M. N. Wang and Z. J. Song, “Classification and analysis of the errors in neuronavigation.,” Neurosurgery, vol. 68, no. 4, p. 1131–43; discussion 1143, Apr. 2011. [14] I. E. C. BiPM, I. IFCC, I. ISO, and O. IUPAP, “International Vocabulary of Metrology--Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms, 2008,” JCGM, vol. 200, pp. 12–99, 2008. [15] I. E. C. BIPM, I. IFCC, I. IUPAC, and O. ISO, “Evaluation of measurement data—guide for the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100: 2008,” Citado en las, p. 167, 2008. [16] A. Standard, “F2554-10 standard practice for measurement of positional accuracy of computer assisted surgical systems,” ASTM Int. West Conshohocken, 2010. [17] C. R. Maurer and J. M. Fitzpatrick, “A review of medical image registration,” Interact. image-guided Neurosurg., vol. 17, p. 49, 1993. [18] T. Haidegger, P. Kazandides, I. Rudas, B. Benyó, and Z. Benyó, “The importance of accuracy measurement standards for computer-integrated interventional systems,” in EURON GEM Sig Workshop on The Role of Experiments in Robotics Research at IEEE ICRA, 2010, pp. 1–6. [19] R. M. Martínez Mañas and others, “Precisión y utilidad de la neuronavegación en la cirugía encefálica,” Universitat de Barcelona, 2004. [20] M. Wang and Z. Song, “How does adding anatomical landmarks as fiducial points in the point-matching registration of neuronavigation influence registration accuracy?,” Comput. Assist. Surg., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 39–45, Jan. 2016. [21] P. Ballesteros-Zebadúa, O. A. García-Garduño, O. O. Galván de la Cruz, A. Arellano-Reynoso, J. M. Lárraga-Gutiérrez, and M. A. Celis, “Assessment of an image-guided neurosurgery system using a head phantom,” Br. J. Neurosurg., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 606–610, Nov. 2016.
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2017 Tecno Lógicasen-US
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 20 No. 38 (2017); 15-26en-US
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 20 Núm. 38 (2017); 15-26es-ES
dc.source2256-5337
dc.source0123-7799
dc.subjectImage-guided surgeryen-US
dc.subjectoptical trackingen-US
dc.subjecterroren-US
dc.subjectuncertaintyen-US
dc.subjectacrylic phantomen-US
dc.subjectmetrology.en-US
dc.subjectCirugía guiada por imágeneses-ES
dc.subjectseguimiento ópticoes-ES
dc.subjecterrores-ES
dc.subjectincertidumbrees-ES
dc.subjectestructura acrílicaes-ES
dc.subjectmetrologíaes-ES
dc.titleA phantom-based study for assessing the error and uncertainty of a neuronavigation systemen-US
dc.titleEvaluación del error y la incertidumbre de un sistema de neuronavegación, estudio basado en una estructura acrílicaes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeResearch Papersen-US
dc.typeArtículos de investigaciónes-ES


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem