Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Representación del conocimiento de un proceso de co-creación de material educativo

dc.creatorMeneses Ortegón, Juan P.
dc.creatorJové, Teodor
dc.creatorPuiggalí , Joan
dc.creatorFabregat, Ramón
dc.date2020-01-30
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/1493
dc.identifier10.22430/22565337.1493
dc.descriptionThe use of co-creation in this study aims to support the generation of educational material by High Ability students with the participation of teachers and students’ parents. During the development of the co-creation process, students’ characteristics such as personality, interests, needs and abilities must be considered and established so that the co‑created educational material is interesting to them. The creation of educational material for students tends to neglect them and their inputs; therefore, the resulting generic materials may not support all students’ learning processes. In addition, High Ability students, because of their characteristics, are susceptible to losing interest in the use of educational materials. Hence, they should be involved in the creation of those materials and manage knowledge that adds value to this creation process. In this study, a Knowledge Management System was designed and implemented so that all participants had access to the knowledge generated during the co-creation process. Said system also contained a module to represent the knowledge of participants in the co-creation process. The Design Science methodology was adopted in this study because it allows the design of the system from a theoretical and environmental perspective; therefore, once the theory and the environment of the system have been identified, the system can be designed and validated. The design of this system was validated identifying participants’ perception of it. The validation showed that the representation of participants’ knowledge allows them to keep in mind students’ characteristics, the relationship of these characteristics with the topic selected for the co-creation process, the relationship with the activities that are carried out, and the relationship with the inputs (contributions, arguments, and ideas).en-US
dc.descriptionEn esta investigación, el uso de la co-creación busca apoyar la generación de material educativo por parte de estudiantes con altas capacidades, gracias a la participación de profesores y padres de los estudiantes. Durante este proceso, las características de los estudiantes como la personalidad, los gustos, las necesidades y habilidades deben ser consideradas y consolidadas, para que el material educativo co-creado sea de interés para ellos. La creación de material educativo para estudiantes tiende a aislar a estos y sus aportes, lo que deriva en materiales genéricos que pueden no ser un apoyo para el proceso de todos los estudiantes. Adicionalmente, los estudiantes con altas capacidades, debido a sus características, tienden a perder interés en el uso de los materiales educativos, razón por la que resulta importante involucrarlos en su creación, a fin de que su conocimiento aporte valor al producto. Para que todos los participantes tengan en cuenta el conocimiento generado durante el desarrollo del proceso de co‑creación, se ha diseñado e implementado un sistema de gestión del conocimiento, que contiene un módulo para la representación del conocimiento sobre los participantes del proceso. La metodología Ciencia del Diseño fue utilizada para el desarrollo de esta investigación, ya que permite diseñar el sistema desde una perspectiva teórica y del entorno, de manera que, una vez identificada la teoría y el entorno del sistema, este pueda ser diseñado y validado. La validación de dicho sistema se adelanta al identificar la percepción de los participantes sobre este. Se ha observado que la representación del conocimiento de los participantes les permite tener presentes las características de los estudiantes y su relación con el tema seleccionado para el proceso de co-creación, las actividades desarrolladas y los aportes (contribuciones, argumentos e ideas).es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formattext/html
dc.formattext/xml
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherInstituto Tecnológico Metropolitano (ITM)en-US
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/1493/1524
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/1493/1610
dc.relationhttps://revistas.itm.edu.co/index.php/tecnologicas/article/view/1493/1597
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Dollinger, J. Lodge, y H. Coates, “Co-creation in higher education: towards a conceptual model,” J. Mark. High. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 210–231, Apr. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2018.1466756
dc.relation/*ref*/H. Zhong, E. Ozsoy, y S. Y. Nof, “Co-Insights framework for collaborative decision support and tacit knowledge transfer,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 45, pp. 85–96, Mar. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.09.036
dc.relation/*ref*/F. Gagné, “De los genes al talento: la perspectiva DMGT/CMTD = From genes to talent: the DMGT/CMTD perspective,” Rev. Educ., no. 368, pp. 12–39, Jun. 2015. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-289
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Saito, K. Umemoto, y M. Ikeda, “A strategy‐based ontology of knowledge management technologies,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 97–114, Feb. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270710728268
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Peffers, T. Tuunanen, M. A. Rothenberger, y S. Chatterjee, “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 45–77, Dec. 2007. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
dc.relation/*ref*/A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, y S. Ram, “Design Science in Information Systems Research,” MIS Q., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 75-105, Mar. 2004. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
dc.relation/*ref*/F. Wang y M. J. Hannafin, “Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 53, pp. 5–23, Dec. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
dc.relation/*ref*/T. H. Davenport y L. Prusak, Working knowledge : how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press. 1998. Disponible en: https://books.google.es/books/about/Working_Knowledge.html?id=-4-7vmCVG5cC&redir_esc=y
dc.relation/*ref*/J. J. Kidwell, K. Vander Linde, y S. L. Johnson, “Applying Corporate Knowledge Management Practices in Higher Education.,” Educ. Q., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 28–33, Dec. 2000. Disponible en: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ621669
dc.relation/*ref*/J. G. Rivera-Berrío, “¿Gestión del conocimiento o gestión de la información?,” TecnoLógicas, no. 16, pp. 59-82, Jun. 2006. https://doi.org/10.22430/22565337.521
dc.relation/*ref*/W. R. King, Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol. 4. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0011-1
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Alavi y D. Leider, “Knowledge management systems: emerging views and practices from the field,” en Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, Maui, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.772754
dc.relation/*ref*/C. I. M. de Lucena, “Framework for collaborative knowledge management in organizations,” (Tesis Doctoral) Facultad de ciencias y Tecnología, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, 2016. Disponible en: https://run.unl.pt/handle/10362/20158
dc.relation/*ref*/A. N. El Bast, W. Kharfan, B. Hussein, M. Ghareeb, y M. Raad, “University customized knowledge management system (KMS),” en 2015 Fifth International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and its Applications (DICTAP), Beirut, 2015. pp. 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTAP.2015.7113186
dc.relation/*ref*/H. A. Tabares-Ospina, D. A. Monsalve-Llano, y D. Diez-Gomez, “Modelo de sistema experto para la selección de personal docente universitario,” TecnoLógicas, no. 30, pp. 51–70, Jun. 2013. https://doi.org/10.22430/22565337.87
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Castelló, Alumnat excepcionalment dotat intel.lectualment: identificació i intervenció educativa. Barcelona: Departament d'Ensenyament, Servei de Difusió i Publicacions, 1999. Disponible en: https://books.google.com.co/books/about/Alumnat_excepcionalment_dotat_intel_lect.html?id=UNWXtAEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Law, A. Russo, y K. Broda, “The complexity and generality of learning answer set programs,” Artif. Intell., vol. 259, pp. 110–146, Jun. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.03.005
dc.relation/*ref*/P. Zeng, Q. Tan, X. Meng, H. Zhang y J. Xu, "Modeling Complex Relationship Paths for Knowledge Graph Completion", IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, vol. E101.D, no. 5, pp. 1393-1400, May. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2017EDP7398
dc.relation/*ref*/Z.-Q. Lin et al., “Intelligent Development Environment and Software Knowledge Graph,” J. Comput. Sci. Technol., vol. 32, pp. 242–249, Mar. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-017-1718-y
dc.relation/*ref*/A. A. Mohammed Saeed y D. Danciulescu, “Modern Interfaces for Knowledge Representation and Processing Systems Based on Markup Technologies,” Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 117-128, Feb. 2018. https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2018.1.3149
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Pfaff y H. Krcmar, “A web-based system architecture for ontology-based data integration in the domain of IT benchmarking,” Enterp. Inf. Syst., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 236–258, May. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2017.1329552
dc.relation/*ref*/V. C. Storey, “Conceptual Modeling Meets Domain Ontology Development,” J. Database Manag., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 18–30, Jan. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4018/JDM.2017010102
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Atabekova, “ICT-based Visualization for Language and Culture Mediation Skills Training: Addressing Societal Needs,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 237, pp. 209–215, Feb. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.065
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Patel y S. Jain, “Formalisms of Representing Knowledge,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 125, pp. 542–549, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.070
dc.relation/*ref*/V. Lifschitz, Answer Set Programming. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24658-7
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Do, T. Tran, y S. Venkatesh, “Knowledge Graph Embedding with Multiple Relation Projections,” in 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Beijing, 2018. pp. 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR.2018.8545027
dc.relation/*ref*/D. Fensel, “Ontologies,” in Ontologies, D. Fensel, Ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001. pp. 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04396-7_2
dc.relation/*ref*/N. Guarino, D. Oberle, y S. Staab, “What Is an Ontology?,” in Handbook on Ontologies, S. Staab and R. Studer, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_0
dc.relation/*ref*/A. M. Collins y M. R. Quillian, “Retrieval time from semantic memory 1,” J. Verbal Learning Verbal Behav., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 240–247, Apr. 1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80069-1
dc.relation/*ref*/N. F. Noy, M. A. Musen, J. L. V. Mejino, y C. Rosse, “Pushing the envelope: challenges in a frame-based representation of human anatomy,” Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 335–359, Mar. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2003.06.002
dc.relation/*ref*/P. Kesarwani y P. Misra, “Selecting Integrated Approach for Knowledge Representation by Comparative Study of Knowledge Representation Schemes,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2013, Feb, 2013. Disponible en: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.299.9499&rep=rep1&type=pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/A. Ali y M. A. Khan, “Selecting predicate logic for knowledge representation by comparative study of knowledge representation schemes,” en 2009 International Conference on Emerging Technologies, Islamabad, 2009. pp. 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET.2009.5353207
dc.relation/*ref*/M. S. Reed, L. C. Stringer, I. Fazey, A. C. Evely, y J. H. J. Kruijsen, “Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 146, pp. 337–345, Dec. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.021
dc.relation/*ref*/Y. Yeh, Y. L Yeh, y Y.-H. Chen, “From knowledge sharing to knowledge creation: A blended knowledge-management model for improving university students’ creativity,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 245–257, Dec. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.05.004
dc.relation/*ref*/K. Ishii, “A fusion program of technology management and career design in a liberal arts curriculum for engineers,” en 2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Kanazawa, 2017. pp. 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2017.8251153
dc.relation/*ref*/S. Katalnikova, L. Novickis, N. Prokofyeva, V. Uskov, y C. Heinemann, “Intelligent Collaborative Educational Systems and Knowledge Representation,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 104, pp. 166–173, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.097
dc.relation/*ref*/W. Sun y W. Zhang, “The Research of Collaborative E-learning System towards Knowledge Management,” en 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, Hubei, 2008. pp. 354–357. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSSE.2008.192
dc.relation/*ref*/J. P. Meneses-Ortegon, T. Jove, R. Fabregat, y M. Y. Uribe-Rios, “Knowlegde management for co-creating educational material with high ability students, teachers and parents,” in 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tenerife, 2018. pp. 1678–1683. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363436
dc.relation/*ref*/J. P. Meneses-Ortegón, T. Jové, R. Fabregat, M. Y. Uribe-Rios, and J. Puiggalí, “Knowledge management tools and technics to support co-creation process of educational material,” en 1th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Seville, 2018. pp. 6424–6431. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2018.2516
dc.relation/*ref*/M. Y. Uribe-Rios, T. Jove, R. Fabregat, y J. P. Meneses-Ortegon, “Co-CreHAs: Co-creation process of enrichment activities for high ability students,” en 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tenerife, 2018. pp. 1645–1651. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363432
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2020 TecnoLógicasen-US
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0en-US
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 23 No. 47 (2020); 159-177en-US
dc.sourceTecnoLógicas; Vol. 23 Núm. 47 (2020); 159-177es-ES
dc.source2256-5337
dc.source0123-7799
dc.subjectKnowledge representationen-US
dc.subjectco-creation processen-US
dc.subjectsemantic networken-US
dc.subjectpersonal learning environmenten-US
dc.subjectknowledge managementen-US
dc.subjectRepresentación del conocimientoes-ES
dc.subjectproceso de co-creaciónes-ES
dc.subjectredes semánticases-ES
dc.subjectambientes personales de aprendizajees-ES
dc.subjectgestión del conocimientoes-ES
dc.titleKnowledge Representation in an Educational Material Co-Creation Processen-US
dc.titleRepresentación del conocimiento de un proceso de co-creación de material educativoes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeResearch Papersen-US
dc.typeArtículos de investigaciónes-ES


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem