Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributorPontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Medicina. Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología
dc.contributorUseche, Luis Fernando
dc.contributorLeal-García, Efraim
dc.creatorUseche, Luis Fernando
dc.creatorGaitán Lee, Hernando
dc.creatorDuarte, María Alejandra
dc.creatorDennis Halley, Patrick
dc.creatorRomero Jaramillo, Alejandro
dc.creatorLeal-García, Efraim
dc.date2023-01-11T15:46:07Z
dc.date2023-01-11T15:46:07Z
dc.date2021-07-03
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-30T14:05:36Z
dc.date.available2025-10-30T14:05:36Z
dc.identifierhttps://josr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13018-021-02584-2#citeas
dc.identifier1749-799X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10554/62761
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02584-2
dc.identifierinstname:Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
dc.identifierreponame:Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
dc.identifierrepourl:https://repository.javeriana.edu.co
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/193811
dc.descriptionQ2
dc.descriptionQ1
dc.descriptionPacientes con Artrosis de cadera primaria
dc.descriptionBackground: When approaching a joint replacement procedure, pre-surgical planning is essential to predict an accurate estimation of implant size and position. There are currently two methods to achieve it, analog and digital. The present study aims to demonstrate how the hybrid technique is accurate and precise for pre-surgical planning in a non-cemented total hip replacement. Methods: Concordance-type study is used against a gold standard, as well as inter- and intra-observer consistency evaluation of two orthopedic surgeons and two orthopedic surgery residents. Accuracy was calculated with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Afterwards, the same calculation was done considering a margin of error with one size more and one less. Results: Thirty-eight patients were included in the study: 19 women and 19 men. Twenty-two prostheses (57.89%) were right-sided and 16 were left (42.11%). Twelve prostheses (31.57%) were Stryker and 26 Johnson & Johnson (68.43%). Acetabular cup correlation compared with the gold standard was moderate: ICC reported 0.45 (95% CI, 0.15–0.76). When adjusted by ± 1 size, ICC was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.18–0.79). On the other hand, results from the femoral stem reported ICC 0.85 (95% CI, 0.07–0.98). When adjusted by ± 1 size, ICC was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.06–0.99). Conclusions: Hybrid templating is a reliable substitute for analog or digital planning. It is quick, inexpensive, accurate, and better results are observed in the femoral component regardless the level of expertise of the evaluator. Level of evidence: Grade IV
dc.descriptionhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-8406
dc.descriptionhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4913-7764
dc.descriptionhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-3639
dc.descriptionRevista Internacional - Indexada
dc.descriptionA2
dc.descriptionNo
dc.formatPDF
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.relation1
dc.relation6
dc.relationJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
dc.relation16
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subjectDigital templating
dc.subjectAnalog templating
dc.subjectPreoperative planning
dc.subjectTotal hip arthroplasty
dc.subjectTotal hip replacement
dc.subjectReliability
dc.titlePrecision and accuracy of pre-surgical planning of non-cemented total hip replacement with calibrated digital images and acetates
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.typeArtículo de revista
dc.typehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.coverageColombia
dc.coverage2018-2019
dc.coverageBogotá (Colombia)


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem