Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creatorEwan, Joseph
dc.date1948-01-01
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-12T17:57:11Z
dc.date.available2026-02-12T17:57:11Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cal/article/view/32808
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/199430
dc.descriptionThe genus Lisianthus as construed by A. H. R. Grisebach in 1839 comprised five sections, as follows: Macrocarpaea, Choriophyllum,  Chelonanthus, Helia, and Calolisianthus. The same sectional treatment of the inclusive genus Lisianthus was maintained in his contribution to De Candolle's Prodromus (1845). Of the five sections recognized by Grisebach Macrocarpaea is the best defined morphologically:  it, as a genus, is the subject of a monographic revision soon to appear in the Contributions of the United States National herbarium. The disposition of the Peruvian Section Choriophyllum (monotypic) has not been determined, pending an examination of the type of Lisianthus loranthoides in England, but it is likely referable to Symbolanthus. Section Calolisianthus, when redefined in the light of present knowledge, has clear limits. Sections Helia and Chelonanthus have never been well defined. Almost completely transitional corolla forms exist among certain species of the two sections, yet there is a strong morphological divergence in the corolla type in this alliance, either toward an open ample tube, or a slender variously gibbous or constricted tube.en-US
dc.descriptionThe genus Lisianthus as construed by A. H. R. Grisebach in 1839 comprised five sections, as follows: Macrocarpaea, Choriophyllum,  Chelonanthus, Helia, and Calolisianthus. The same sectional treatment of the inclusive genus Lisianthus was maintained in his contribution to De Candolle's Prodromus (1845). Of the five sections recognized by Grisebach Macrocarpaea is the best defined morphologically:  it, as a genus, is the subject of a monographic revision soon to appear in the Contributions of the United States National herbarium. The disposition of the Peruvian Section Choriophyllum (monotypic) has not been determined, pending an examination of the type of Lisianthus loranthoides in England, but it is likely referable to Symbolanthus. Section Calolisianthus, when redefined in the light of present knowledge, has clear limits. Sections Helia and Chelonanthus have never been well defined. Almost completely transitional corolla forms exist among certain species of the two sections, yet there is a strong morphological divergence in the corolla type in this alliance, either toward an open ample tube, or a slender variously gibbous or constricted tube.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - Sede Bogotá - Facultad de Ciencias - Instituto de Ciencias Naturaleses-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/cal/article/view/32808/32798
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 1948 Caldasiaes-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceCaldasia; Vol. 5 No. 21 (1948); 87-98en-US
dc.sourceCaldasia; Vol. 5 Núm. 21 (1948); 87-98es-ES
dc.source2357-3759
dc.source0366-5232
dc.subjectPurdieanthusen-US
dc.subjectLehmaniellaen-US
dc.subjectLisianthusen-US
dc.subjectPurdieen-US
dc.subjectPurdieanthuses-ES
dc.subjectLehmaniellaes-ES
dc.subjectLisianthuses-ES
dc.subjectPurdiees-ES
dc.titleA Review of Purdieanthus and Lehmaniella, two endemic Colombian Genera of Gentianaceae, and Biographical Notes on Purdie and Lehmannen-US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem