Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Adherence to protective mechanical ventilation parameters in patients over 18 years of age, with invasive mechanical ventilation at the Central Military Hospital

dc.contributorPolanco, Lucas
dc.contributorPolanco Lucas
dc.contributorVelasquez Juan Pablo
dc.creatorMedina ahumada, Patricia
dc.creatorDelgado Lasso, Rene Arturo
dc.creatorMedina ahumada, Patricia
dc.date2020-03-17T16:49:59Z
dc.date2020-03-17T16:49:59Z
dc.date2019-11-07
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-25T19:28:42Z
dc.date.available2026-03-25T19:28:42Z
dc.identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/10654/35118
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/201466
dc.descriptionLa ventilacion mecanica hace referencia al uso de dispositivos para asistir parcial o totalmente la respiracion del paciente, herramienta utilizada en los pacientes cuya dinamica ventilatoria no es adecuada.Llimitar el daño producido por las difernetes variables que componen el soporte, proporcionando una estrategia de ventilacion fisiologicamente segura, se conoce como estratgia de ventilacion protectora. El objetivo de esta estudio es determinar la adherencia al protocolo de ventilacion mecanica protectora en los pacientes mayores de 18 años que requieren ventilacion mecanica en el Hospital Militar Central.
dc.descriptionMechanical ventilation refers to the use of devices to partially or fully assist the patient's breathing, a tool used in patients whose ventilatory dynamics are not adequate. Limit the damage caused by the different deferred components that make up the support, providing a physiologically ventilated strategy Sure, it is known as protective ventilation strategy. The objective of this study is to determine the adherence to the protective mechanical ventilation protocol in patients older than 18 years who require mechanical ventilation in the Central Military Hospital
dc.descriptionTABLA DE CONTENIDO 1. Resumen………………………………………………………………………………………4 1.1 Introducción………………………………………………………………………………….4 1.2 Metodos……………………………………………………………………………………...4 1.3 Resultados…………………………………………………………………………………..4 2. Identificación y formulación del problema…………………………………………………7 3. Objetivos e hipotesis……………………………………………………………………….10 3.1 Objetvo general……………………………………………………………………………10 3.2 Objetivos especificos……………………………………………………………………..10 3.3 Hipotesis……………………………………………………………………………………10 4. Metodología propuesta……...……………………………………………………………..11 4.1 Clasificación del estudio………………………………………………………………….11 4.2 Lugar………………………………………………………………………………………..11 4.3 Caracteristicas de la población…………………………………………………………..11 4.4 Variables……………………………………………………………………………………11 4.5 Aspectos del proceso de medición y seguimineto…………………………………….15 4.6 Muestra…………………………………………………………………………………….15 4.7 Mediciones e instrumentos.……………………………………………………………...16 5. Plan de análisis……………………………………………………………………………..17 6. Aspectos éticos……………………………………………………………………………..19 7. Resultados…………………………………………………………………………………..20 8. Discusión…………………………………………………………………………………….29 9. Conclusiones………………………………………………………………………………..33 10. Bibliografía…………………………………………………………………………………34
dc.descriptionEspecialización
dc.formatpdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Militar Nueva Granada
dc.publisherMedicina interna
dc.publisherFacultad de Medicina
dc.publisherMedicina y Ciencias de la Salud - Medicina interna
dc.relation1. Murray and Nadel’s (2016) Textbook of Respiratory Medicine, Sixth Edition. Elsevier, 101, 1761-1777.e4.
dc.relation2. Parrillo, Joseph E., MD; Dellinger, R. Phillip, MD. (2014) Critical Care Medicine: Principles of Diagnosis and Management in the Adult. Fourth Edition. Elsevier. 9, 138-152.e4.
dc.relation3. Dries David J. Mechanical Ventilation: History and Harm. Air Medical Journal 35:1
dc.relation4. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301-8.
dc.relation5. Determann, R. and Cols. RVeeseanrcthilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with conventional tidal volumes for patients without acute lung injury: a preventive randomized controlled trial. Critical Care 2010, 14:R1
dc.relation6. Sutherasan Y. and Cols. Protective mechanical ventilation in the non-injured lung: review and meta-analysis. Critical Care 2014, 18:211
dc.relation7. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Clinical Trials Network. Higher versus Lower Positive End-Expiratory Pressures in Patients with the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004;351:327-36.
dc.relation8. Gordo F and Cols. What PEEP level should I use in my patient? Med Intensiva. 2017;41(5):267-269
dc.relation9. Haitsma J. Physiology of Mechanical Ventilation. Crit Care Clin 23 (2007) 117–134
dc.relation10. Koh S. and Cols. Mode of Mechanical Ventilation: Volume Controlled Mode. Crit Care Clin 23 (2007) 161–167
dc.relation11. Nichols D. and Cols, Pressure Control Ventilation. Pressure Control Ventilation
dc.relation12. Seiberlich E. and Cols. Protective Mechanical Ventilation, Why Use It? Rev Bras Anestesiol 2011; 61: 5: 659-667
dc.relation13. Haas. Carls and Cols. Mechanical Ventilation with Lung Protective Strategies: What Works? Crit Care Clin 27 (2011) 469–486
dc.relation14. Daoud E. and Cols. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: What Do We Know? respiratory care february 2012 Vol 57 No 2
dc.relation15. Wright B. Lung-protective Ventilation Strategies and Adjunctive Treatments for the Emergency Medicine Patient with Acute Respiratory Failure. Emerg Med Clin N Am - (2014)
dc.relation16. Determann et al. RVeeseanrcthilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with conventional tidal volumes for patients without acute lung injury: a preventive randomized controlled trial. Critical Care 2010, 14:R1
dc.relation17. De Feo P ando Cols. Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003844
dc.relation18. Amato M. Driving Pressure and Survival in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2015;372:747-55.
dc.relation19. Budinger S. Balancing the Risks and Benefi ts of Oxygen Therapy in Critically Ill Adults. chest / 143 / 4 / april 2013
dc.relation20. Rachmale S. Practice of Excessive FIO2 and Effect on Pulmonary Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Lung Injury. respiratory care november 2012 vol 57 No 11
dc.relation21. Ljland M. Bench-to-bedside review: Hypercapnic acidosis in lung injury - from ‘permissive’ to ‘therapeutic’. Ijland et al. Critical Care 2010, 14:237
dc.relation22. Fan E, Del Sorbo L, Goligher EC, et al. An Official 29. American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195:1253-63
dc.relation23. Hashimoto S, and Cols. The clinical practice guideline for the management of ARDS in Japan. Journal of Intensive Care (2017) 5:50
dc.relation24. Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, Pereira VG, Esposito DC, Pasqualucci Mde O, et al. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2012;308(16):1651-1659
dc.relation25. David A Turner, and Cols. (2013) Lung protective ventilation: a summary of the current evidence from the 2012 American Association for Respiratory Care International Congress, Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine, 7:3, 209-212
dc.relation26. Ochiai R. Mechanical ventilation of acute respiratory distress síndrome. Journal of Intensive Care (2015) 3:25
dc.relation27. Passos M. and Cols. effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998;338:347-54
dc.relation28. Lellouche F. Prophylactic protective ventilation: lower tidal volumes for all critically ill patients? Intensive Care Med (2013) 39:6–15
dc.relation29. Pham T. And Cols. Mechanical Ventilation: State of the Art. Mayo Clin Proc. September 2017;92(9):1382-1400
dc.relation30. Sutherasan Y, Vargas M, Pelosi P. Protective mechanical ventilation in the non-injured lung: review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2014; 18(2):211
dc.relation31. Petrucci N, De Feo C. Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013(2):CD003844
dc.relation32. Writing Group for the PI, Simonis FD, Serpa Neto A, Binnekade JM, Braber A, Bruin KCM, et al. Effect of a low vs intermediate tidal volume strategy on ventilator-free days in intensive care unit patients without ARDS: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;320(18):1872- 1880
dc.relation33. Koide M, Uchiyama A, Yamashita T, Yoshida T, Fujino Y. Attaining low tidal volume ventilation during patient-triggered ventilation in sedated subjects. Respir Care 2019;64(8):890-898
dc.relation34. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA 2016;315:788-800
dc.relation35. Nadeem RN, Elhoufi AM, Soliman MA, Bon I, Obaida ZA, Hussien MM, Salama L, Elsousi AN, Kamat S, Satti RM, Elahi N, Abuhijleh RH, ElZeiny MG, Fargaly H, Ibrahim MM. Clinical Predictors of Adherence to Low Tidal Volume Ventilation Practice: Is it Different on Weekend and Night Shifts?. Cureus. 2019 Jun 6;11(6):e4844
dc.relationKalb T, Raikhelkar J, Meyer S, Ntimba F, Thuli J, Gorman MJ, Kopec I, Scurlock C. A multicenter population based effectiveness study of teleintensive care unit directed ventilatorrounds demonstrating improved adherence to a protective lung strategy, decreased ventilatorduration, and decreased intensive care unit mortality. J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):691.e7-14
dc.relation37. Laffey JG, Madotto F, Bellani G, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, et al; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Geo-economic variations in epidemiology, patterns of care, and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: insights from the LUNG SAFE prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2017; 5(8):627–638
dc.relation38. Needham DM, Yang T, Dinglas VD, Mendez-Tellez PA, Shanholtz C, Sevransky JE, Brower RG, Pronovost PJ, Colantuoni E. Timing of Low Tidal Volume Ventilation and Intensive Care Unit Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
A Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan 15;191(2):177-85
dc.rightsDerechos Reservados - Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, 2020
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/co/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas
dc.subjectRESPIRACION ARTIFICIAL
dc.subjectCUIDADOS INTENSIVOS (MEDICINA)
dc.subjectAPARATO RESPIRATORIO
dc.subjectVentilación mecánica
dc.subjectVentilación protectora
dc.subjectVolumen corriente
dc.subjectPresión de conducción
dc.subjectPresión plateau
dc.subjectMechanical ventilation
dc.subjectProtective ventilation
dc.subjectTidal volume
dc.subjectDriving pressure
dc.subjectPlateau pressure
dc.titleAdherencia a los parámetros de ventilación mecánica protectora en los pacientes mayores de 18 años, con ventilación mecánica invasiva en el Hospital Militar Central
dc.titleAdherence to protective mechanical ventilation parameters in patients over 18 years of age, with invasive mechanical ventilation at the Central Military Hospital
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
dc.typeTrabajo de grado
dc.typeText
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
dc.coverageMedicina


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem