Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSmith, Carl G.spa
dc.contributor.authorHamel, Paul B.spa
dc.contributor.authorGullo, Manoelle Fuzarospa
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-19T21:06:56Z
dc.date.available2010-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2023-09-19T21:06:56Z
dc.date.issued2010-07-01
dc.identifier.issn0120-0739
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/44289
dc.description.abstractLas especies de roble constituyen un componente evidente y frecuentemente dominante de los bosques de tierras bajas del Valle Aluvial de Mississippi. Durante los últimos dos siglos, la extensión de estos bosques se ha reducido drásticamente como resultado del corte de árboles para el uso agrícola de tierras. Los patrones de tala han reducido la distribución de los parches de bosque restantes a un subconjunto del paisaje mucho más propenso a inundaciones que nunca antes se habían conocido en la historia, reduciendo la diversidad de especies de roble que actualmente existen en el paisaje. Talas intensivas han cambiado adicionalmente la composición de los rodales restantes. Pequeños parches restantes de los bosques primarios siguen existiendo como áreas naturales de investigación en el bosque denominado Delta National Forest ubicado en el Condado de Sharkey, Mississippi. En particular, las áreas naturales de investigación denominadas Roble Overcup (Quercus lyrata) y Liquidámbar Americano (Liquidambar styracilua) tienen componentes importantes de los árboles con que fueron nombradas, así como Quercus nuttallii y componentes más pequeños de otras especies. Un reciente interés en forestación ha causado el resurgimiento del interés en la restauración de bosques de roble en las tierras agrícolas abandonadas de la región. Hemos estudiado la respuesta de pequeños mamíferos a esta restauración utilizando un experimento extensivo cerca del Bosque Nacional Delta (Delta National Forest) desde 1995. También examinamos la respuesta de pequeños mamíferos a un tornado que afectó aproximadamente la mitad del Área Natural de Investigación de Roble Overcup (Overcup Oak Research Natural Area) en 2008. Utilizamos estos estudios para demostrar la manera cómo se pueden obtener estas estimaciones de población de pequeños mamíferos con base en estudios de captura-recaptura, empleando diferentes diseños y utilizando el programa denominado Program Capture para calcular la población. Las comunidades de pequeños mamíferos que habitan en estos rodales son más especiosas en la sucesión temprana que en el bosque primario. El estudio de las respuestas a los daños que fueron causados por el tornado al área natural de investigación de roble Overcup es complicado por el hecho de que este tipo de bosque en particular es muy propenso a inundaciones, lo cual crea obstáculos a su colonización por pequeños mamíferos.spa
dc.description.abstractOak species form a conspicuous and often dominant component of bottomland forests of the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. The extent of these forests has been drastically reduced as a result of clearing for agriculture in the past two centuries. Patterns of clearing have reduced the distribution of remaining forest patches to a much more lood-prone subset of the landscape than was historically the case, reducing the diversity of oak species currently present on the landscape. Intensive harvesting has further changed the composition of the remaining stands. Small remnant patches of primary forest continue to exist as Research Natural Areas on the Delta National Forest in Sharkey County, Mississippi. In particular, the Overcup Oak (Quercus lyrata) and Redgum (Liquidambar styracilua) Research Natural Areas present substantial components of the trees for which the areas were named, as well as Quercus nuttallii and smaller components of other species. Recent interest in afforestation has produced a resurgence of interest in restoration of oak forest to abandoned farmland in the region. We have studied small mammal response to restoration on an extensive experiment near the Delta National Forest since 1995. We have also examined small mammal response to a tornado that disturbed approximately half of the Overcup Oak Research Natural Area in 2008. We use these studies to demonstrate how population estimates of small mammals can be obtained from capture-recapture studies, employing different designs, and utilizing Program Capture for population estimation. Small mammal communities in these stands are more species-rich in early succession than in primary forest. The study of response to tornado damage to the Overcup Oak Research Natural Area is complicated by the fact that this particular forest type is very lood-prone, creating obstacles to colonization by small mammals. Analysis of capture-recapture data with robust methods illustrated in this study permits extraction of more information from the same ield effort expended in time-consuming small mammal trapping studies that have been subjected to less detailed analysis. Our work may prove useful to others interested in study of small mammals in oak forest systems in Central and South America.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldasspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/view/3452spa
dc.subjectdisturbanceeng
dc.subjectpopulation estimationeng
dc.subjectsampling methodseng
dc.subjectPeromyscuseng
dc.subjectprogram captureeng
dc.subjectQuercus.eng
dc.subjectdisturbiospa
dc.subjectestimación poblacionalspa
dc.subjectmétodos de muestreospa
dc.subjectPeromyscusspa
dc.subjectperturbaciónspa
dc.subjectprograma de capturaspa
dc.subjectQuercus.spa
dc.subjectdisturbiospa
dc.subjectestimación poblacionalspa
dc.subjectmétodos de muestreospa
dc.subjectPeromyscusspa
dc.subjectperturbaciónspa
dc.subjectprograma de capturaspa
dc.subjectQuercus.spa
dc.titleEvaluación de la respuesta de pequeños mamíferos a disturbios naturales y a la restauración de robledales y ecosistemas asociados en el valle aluvial de Mississippi.spa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.identifier.doi10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2010.2.a09
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.title.translatedEvaluating Small Mammal Response To Natural Disturbance And Restoration In Oak Ecosystems In The Mississippi Alluvial Valley.eng
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.relation.referencesAragon, E.E., A. Garza, & F.A. Cervantes. 2009. Structure and organization of rodent assembles of a forest of the Sierra Madre Occidental, Durango, Mexico. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 82:523-542.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarko, V. A. & G.A. Feldhamer. 2002. Cotton mice (Peromyscus gossypinus) in southern Illinois: Evidence for hybridization with whitefooted mice (Peromyscus leucopus). American Midland Naturalist 147:109-115.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarrett, G. W., & G. A. Feldhamer. 2008. The golden mouse: ecology and conservation. New York: Springer-Verlag.spa
dc.relation.referencesBowman, J. C., D. Sleep, G. J. Forbes, & M. Edwards. 2000. The association of small mammals with coarse woody debris at log and stand scales. Forest Ecology and Management 129:119-124.spa
dc.relation.referencesCorredor Prado, J. P. & D.A. Bejarano Bonilla. 2009. Pequeños mamíferos no voladores de la reserva natural Ibanasca (Tolima, Colombia). Revista Tumbaga 4:121-134.spa
dc.relation.referencesCujar-Tovar, A. 2006. Uso del hábitat del venado (Mazama ruina) en la Reserva Biológica Cachalú y su área de inluencia. pp. 101 ­ 118. En: C. Solano & N. Vargas (eds.). Memorias del I Simposio Internacional de Robles y Ecosistemas Asociados. Fundacion Natura­Pontiicia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá.spa
dc.relation.referencesDevall, M. S. & P. F. Ramp. 1992. U.S. Forest Service Research Natural Areas and protection of old growth in the south. Natural Areas Journal 12:75-85.spa
dc.relation.referencesDickson, J. G. (ed.). 2001. Wildlife of southern forests: habitat and management. Blaine, Washington: Hancock House Publishers. 480 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesFantz, D. K. & R. B. Renken. 2005. Short-term landscape-scale effects of forest management on Peromyscus spp. mice within Missouri Ozark Forests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 33:293-301.spa
dc.relation.referencesFleming, T. H. 1974. The population ecology of two species of Costa Rican heteromyid rodents. Ecology 55:493-510.spa
dc.relation.referencesGardiner, E. S., D.C. Dey, & J.A. Stanturf. 2010. Approaches to restoration of oak forests on farmed lowlands in the eastern U.S. II Simposio Internacional de Robles y Ecosistemas Asociados. Noviembre 12, 13 de 2009. Revista Colombia Forestal Vol. 13 (2): 223-236. Bogotá.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreenberg, C. H. 2002. Response of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) to coarse woody debris and microsite use in southern Appalachian treefall gaps. Forest Ecology and Management 164:57-66.spa
dc.relation.referencesHadley, G. L. & K. R. Wilson. 2004. Patterns of density and survival in small mammals in ski runs and adjacent forest patches. Journal of Wildlife Management 68:288-298.spa
dc.relation.referencesHamel, P. B. 2003. Winter bird community differences among methods of bottomland hardwood forest restoration: results after seven growing seasons. Forestry 76(2):189-197.spa
dc.relation.referencesHammond, E. L. & R. G. Anthony. 2006. Mark­ recapture estimates of population parameters for selected species of small mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 87:618-627.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarmon, M. E., J. F. Franklin, F. J. Swanson, P. Sollins, S. V. Gregory, J. D. Lattin, N. H. Anderson, S. P. Cline, N. G. Aumen, J. R. Sedell, G. W. Lienkaemper, K. Cromack Jr., K. W. Cummins. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Advances in Ecological Research 15:133-302.spa
dc.relation.referencesHodges, J. D. 1997. Development and ecology of bottomland hardwood sites. Forest Ecology and Management 90:117-125.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoeb, S. C. 1999. Responses of small mammals to coarse woody debris in a southeastern pine forest. Journal of Mammalogy 80:460-471.spa
dc.relation.referencesLopez-Barrera, F. & R. H. Manson. 2006. Ecology of acorn dispersal by small mammals in montane forests of Chiapas, Mexico. pp.165­ 176. En: M. Kappelle (ed.). Ecology and conservation of Neotropical montane oak forests. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcCay, T. S. 2000. Use of woody debris by cotton mice (Peromyscus gossypinus) in a southeastern pine forest. Journal of Mammalogy 81:527-535.spa
dc.relation.referencesMacDonald, P. O., W. E. Frayer, & J. K. Clauser. 1979. Documentation, Chronology and Future Projections of Bottomland Hardwood Habitat Loss in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Plain. Vol. 1. HRB-Singer. Inc. State College. Pennsylvania.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcMinn, J. W., & D. A. Crossley Jr. (eds.). 1996. Biodiversity and coarse woody debris in southern forests, proceedings of the workshop on coarse woody debris in southern forests: effects on biodiversity; 1993 October 18-20; Athens, GA. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-94. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Asheville, N.C.: U.S.spa
dc.relation.referencesMills, J. N., T.L. Yates, J. E. Childs, R. R. Parmenter, T. G. Ksiazek, P. E. Rollin, & C. J. Peters. 1995. Guidelines for working with rodents potentially infected with Hantavirus. Journal of Mammalogy 76:716-722.spa
dc.relation.referencesNational Weather Service. 2008. Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena. Acceso: March 2008. Disponible en:http://www.srh.noaa.gov/ jan/stormdata/data/mar2008.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesNavarro Arquez, E. 2005. Abundancia relativa y distribución de los indicios de las especies de mamíferos medianos en dos coberturas vegetales en el santuario de lora y fauna Otún Quimbaya, Pereira­Colombia. Trabajo de Grado, Pontiicia Universidad Javeriana, Facultad de Ciencias, Bogotá. 78 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesOsbourne, J. D. & J. T. Anderson. 2002. Small mammal response to coarse woody debris in the central Appalachians. Proceedings of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 56:198-209.spa
dc.relation.referencesOsbourne, J. D., J. T. Anderson, & A. B. Spurgeon. 2005. Effects of habitat on small-mammal diversity and abundance in West Virginia. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 33:814-822.spa
dc.relation.referencesOtálora Ardila, A. 2003. Mamíferos de los bosques de roble. Acta Biologica Colombiana 8:57-71.spa
dc.relation.referencesOtis, D. L., K. P. Burnham, G. C. White, & D. R. Anderson. 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs: 62: 1-135.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, H. E. & W. A. Pérez. 2007. Mamíferos de un fragmento de bosque de roble en el Departamento del Cauca, Colombia. Boletin Cientiico Universidad de Caldas 11: 65-79.spa
dc.relation.referencesRexstad, E., & K. P. Burnham. 1991. Users Guide for Interactive Program CAPTURE. Colorado Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research Unit. Colorado State University. Fort Collins. Colorado.spa
dc.relation.referencesRojas Rojas, L. & M. Barboza Rodriguez. 2007. Ecología poblacional del ratón Peromyscus mexicanus (Rodentia: Muridae) en el Parque Nacional Volcán Poás, Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical 55:1037-1050.spa
dc.relation.referencesSaitoh, T., J. O. Vik, N.C. Stenseth, T. Takanishi, S. Hayakashi, N. Ishida, M. Ohmori, T. Morita, S. Uemura, M. Kadomatsu, J. Osawa, K. Maekawa. 2008. Effects of acorn abundance on density dependence in a Japanese wood mouse (Apodemus speciosus) population. Population Ecology 50:159-167.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Cordero, V. 2001. Elevation gradients of diversity for rodents and bats in Oaxaca, Mexico. Global Ecology and Biogeography 10:63-76.spa
dc.relation.referencesSavage, L., J. Anthony, & R. Buchholz. 1996. Rodent damage to direct seeded willow oak in Louisiana. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 50:340-349.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchweitzer, C. J., J. A. Stanturf, J. P. Shepard, T. M. Wilkins, C. J. Portwood, & L. C. Dorris, Jr. 1997. Large-scale comparison of reforestation techniques commonly used in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley: irst year results. pp. 313-320. En: S. G. Pallardy, R. A. Cecich, H. Garrett & P.S. Johnson (eds). Proceedings of the 11th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; 23-26 March 1997, Columbia, MO. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-188. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St Paul, MN.spa
dc.relation.referencesShanker, K. 2000. Small mammal trapping in tropical montane forests of the Upper Nilgiris, southern India: an evaluation of capture-recapture models in estimating abundance. Journal of Biosciences 25:99-111.spa
dc.relation.referencesTietje, W. D., D.E. Lee, & J.K. Vreeland. 2008. Survival and abundance of three species of mice in relation to density of shrubs and prescribed ire in understory of an oak woodland in California. Southwestern Naturalist 53:357-369.spa
dc.relation.referencesTioli, S., F. Cagnacci, A. Stradiotto, & A. Rizzoli. 2009. Edge effect on density estimates of a radiotracked population of yellow-necked mice. Journal of Wildlife Management 73:184-190.spa
dc.relation.referencesTobler, M. W., E.J. Naranjo, & I. Lira-Torres. 2006. Habitat preference, feeding habits and conservation of Baird's Tapir in Neotropical montane oak forests. pp. 347 ­ 362 En: M. Kappelle (ed.). Ecology and conservation of Neotropical montane oak forests. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Germany.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan den Bergh, M. B., & M. Kappelle. 1998. Diversity and distribution of small terrestrial rodents along a disturbance gradient in montane Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical 46:331-338.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan den Bergh, M. B., & M. Kappelle. 2006. Small terrestrial rodents in disturbed and oldgrowth montane oak forest in Costa Rica. pp. 337 ­ 345. En: M. Kappelle (ed.). Ecology and conservation of Neotropical montane oak forests. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Germany.spa
dc.relation.referencesVázquez, L. B., R. A. Medellín, & G. N. Cameron. 2000. Population and community ecology of small rodents in montane forest of western Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy 81:77-85.spa
dc.relation.referencesWalker, R. & E. Cárdenas. 2004. Evaluación del estado de conservación de la fauna en el municipio de Murillo, Tolima. Boletin Cientiico. Universidad de Caldas: 15-29.spa
dc.relation.referencesWiewel, A. S., A. A. Yackel Adams, & G. H. Rodda. 2009. Evaluating abundance estimate precision and the assumptions of a count-based index for small mammals. Journal of Wildlife Management 73:761-771.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhite, G. C., D. R. Anderson, K. P. Burnham, & D. L. Otis. 1982. Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Los Alamos National Laboratory LA-8787NERP. Los Alamos, New México. 235 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhite, G. C. & K. P. Burnham. 1999. Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 Supplement:120-138.spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationvolume13spa
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 2 , Año 2010 : Julio-Diciembrespa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalColombia forestalspa
dc.identifier.eissn2256-201X
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2010.2.a09
dc.relation.citationstartpage335
dc.relation.citationendpage346
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/download/3452/4973
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/download/3452/5178
dc.type.contentTextspa
dspace.entity.typePublicationspa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/