Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorDay, Daniel Cspa
dc.contributor.authorRoyo, Alejandro Aspa
dc.contributor.authorBrose, Patrick H.spa
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, Todd Fspa
dc.contributor.authorSpetich, Martin Aspa
dc.contributor.authorStoleson, Scott H.spa
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-19T21:06:57Z
dc.date.available2010-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2023-09-19T21:06:57Z
dc.date.issued2010-07-01
dc.identifier.issn0120-0739
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/44291
dc.description.abstractLos encinos constituyen un género (Quercus L.) abundante y ampliamente distribuido en los bosques del este de Norte América. La dominancia de los encinos se debe, en gran parte, a una historia de frecuentes disturbios que incluyen fuegos, herbivoría por mamíferos y explotación forestal. Alteraciones a estos regímenes de disturbios históricos hacia disturbios con menos frecuencia e intensidad, y la supresión de fuego, han ocasionado un remplazo gradual de los encinos. El aumento de poblaciones de herbívoros mamíferos (por ejemplo, Odocoileus virginianus), de insectos invasivos (por ejemplo, Lymantria dispar), o la dominancia de arbustos nativos (por ejemplo, Kalmia latifolia) impiden la regeneración de los encinos y contribuyen a su deterioro dentro de una región. La regeneración exitosa de los encinos depende de obtener un nivel adecuado de regeneración avanzada antes de que se inicien los cortes inales. La producción de bellotas puede incrementarse en rodales jóvenes con la aplicación de raleos para estimular el desarrollo de los doseles, o en rodales maduros utilizando una serie de cortes de protección para estimular la producción de semillas. Los cortes de protección suelen estimular el desarrollo de especies helióilas como los encinos, porque aumentan la luminosidad en el sotobosque. Estos cortes usualmente se aplican en conjunto con procedimientos para controlar la vegetación en el sotobosque que compite con los encinos, como el uso de herbicidas o quemas prescritas. Si existe una cantidad adecuada de regeneración avanzada, el uso de la tala raza es apropiado, pero usualmente requiere el control de la competencia (por ejemplo, de malezas) que puede desarrollarse después de la cosecha. La quema prescrita, aplicada una o varias veces después de los cortes de protección o de la tala raza, es una práctica viable que favorece a los encinos. Todas estas intervenciones generalmente ocasionan una respuesta relativamente neutra o positiva a las comunidades de otros grupos de organismos como plantas herbáceas, aves, mamíferos, y la herpetofauna.spa
dc.description.abstractOak (Quercus L.) is an abundant and widely distributed genus in eastern North America. A history of periodic ire, grazing, canopy disturbance and timber harvesting has favored oak's dominance. But, changes in this regime toward much less ire or complete ire suppression, and selective cutting are causing the successional replacement of oak. High populations of forest herbivores such as whitetailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), invasive species such as gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar), or dominance of native lora such as mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia) can also inhibit oak regeneration and add to its loss within a region. Successful oak regeneration is dependent on having an adequate number of large oak advance reproduction before stand regeneration. However, this prerequisite is often lacking in eastern oak forests. Many oak stands have either few or no oak advance reproduction, and when present, it is small and noncompetitive. These common situations can be addressed through silviculture. The lack of oak seedlings in older, mature stands is addressed with a three-stage shelterwood method that promotes acorn production and site preparatory burning that increases acorn germination success. In younger, i.e., sapling and pole stands, crop tree thinning to release co-dominant oaks promotes crown development and future acorn production. The lack of competitive-sized oak reproduction is addressed with a two ­ or three ­ stage shelterwood sequence because this method is very useful for providing adequate light to foster root development of the shade intolerant oak seedlings. Application of the shelterwood method often includes herbicides or prescribed ire to control competing vegetation either before or after the inal overstory removal. When adequate oak advance reproduction is present, then clearcutting is a viable option, but measures may be needed after harvesting to control competing vegetation. Prescribed ire applied several times after inal removal of the shelterwood, or clearcutting is proving a useful tool to favor oak. These silvicultural practices generally have either no or positive impacts on non-target communities of herbaceous plants, mammals, birds, and herpetofauna.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldasspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/view/3454spa
dc.subjectecologíaspa
dc.subjectencinospa
dc.subjectregeneraciónspa
dc.subjectQuercusspa
dc.subjectroblespa
dc.subjectsilvicultura.spa
dc.subjectecologyeng
dc.subjectoakeng
dc.subjectregenerationeng
dc.subjectQuercuseng
dc.subjectsilviculture.eng
dc.titleUna aproximación ecológica a la silvicultura del roble:síntesis de 50 años de investigación en ecosistemas de roble en Norteaméricaspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.identifier.doi10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2010.2.a02
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcspa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.title.translatedAn Ecologically Based Approach To Oak Silviculture:A Synthesis Of 50 Years Of Oak Ecosystem Research In North Americaeng
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.relation.referencesAbrams, M. D. 1998. The red maple paradox. BioScience 48: 355-364.spa
dc.relation.referencesAbrams, M. D. 2002. The post glacial history of oak forests in eastern North America, pp. 3445. In: McShea & W.M. Healy (eds.). Oak forest ecosystems ecology and management for wildlife. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore.spa
dc.relation.referencesAbrams, M.D. & G.J. Nowacki 1992. Historic variation in ire, oak recruitment, and post-logging accelerated succession in central Pennsylvania. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 119: 19-28.spa
dc.relation.referencesAnnand, E. M. & F. R. Thompson 1997. Forest bird response to regeneration practices in central hardwood forests. Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 159-171.spa
dc.relation.referencesAquilani, S. M., D. C. LeBlanc & T. E. Morrell. 2000. Effects of prescribed surface ires on ground- and shrub-nesting Neotropical migratory birds in a mature Indiana oak forest, USA. Natural Areas Journal 20: 317-324.spa
dc.relation.referencesArtman, V. L., E. K. Sutherland & J. F. Downhower. 2001. Prescribed burning to restore mixed-oak communities in southern Ohio: effects on breeding-bird populations. Conservation Biology 15: 1423-1434.spa
dc.relation.referencesAsh, A. N. 1997. Disappearance and Return of Plethodontid Salamanders to Clearcut Plots in the Southern Blue Ridge Mountains.Conservation Biology 11: 983-989.spa
dc.relation.referencesAshton, P. M. S. & G. P. Berlyn. 1994. A comparison of leaf physiology and anatomy of Quercus (section Erythrobalanus - Fagaceae) species in different light environments. American Journal of Botany 81: 589-597.spa
dc.relation.referencesAuchmoody, L. R. & H. C. Smith. 1993. Survival of acorns after fall burning. Research Paper NE-678. USDA Forest Service. Radnor: Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.spa
dc.relation.referencesAugenfeld, K. H., S. B. Franklin & D.H. Snyder. 2008. Breeding bird communities of upland hardwood forest 12 years after shelterwood logging. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 1271-1282.spa
dc.relation.referencesBailey, R. G. 1995. Descriptions of the ecoregions of the United States. USDA Misc. Washington: Publication 1391.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaker, M. D. & M. J. Lacki. 1997. Short-term changes in bird communities in response to silvicultural prescriptions. Forest Ecology and Management 96: 27-36.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarnes, T. A. & D. H. Van Lear. 1998. Prescribed ire effects on advanced regeneration in mixed hardwood stands. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 22: 138-142.spa
dc.relation.referencesBashant, A. L., R. D. Nyland, H. M. Engelman, K. K. Bohn, J. M. Verostek, P. J. Donoso & R. L. Nissen Jr. 2005. The role of interfering plants in regenerating hardwood stands of northeastern North America. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station. Miscellaneous publication 753. USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesBattles, J. J., A. J. Shlisky, R. H. Barrett, R. C. Heald & B. H. Allen-Diaz. 2001. The effects of forest management on plant species diversity in a Sierran conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 146: 211-222.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlake, J. G. 2005. Effects of prescribed burning on distribution and abundance of birds in a closedcanopy oak-dominated forest, Missouri, USA. Biological Conservation. 121: 519-531.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoerner, R. E. J. 2006. Soil, ire, water, and wind: how the elements conspire in the forest context, pp. 104-122. In: M. B. Dickinson (ed.). USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station General Technical Report NRS-P-1. Newtown Square, PA, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoerner, R. E. J. & J. Huang. 2008. Shifts in morphological traits, seed production, and early establishment of Desmodium nudilorum following prescribed ire, alone or in combination with forest canopy thinning. Botany 86: 376-384.spa
dc.relation.referencesBowman, J., G. Forbes & T. Dilworth. 2000. The spatial scale of variability in small-mammal populations. Ecography 23: 328-334.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrawn, J. D., S. K. Robinson & F. R. Thompson, III. 2001. The role of disturbance in the ecology and conservation of birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 251-276.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrose, P. H. 2008. Root development of acorn-origin oak seedlings in shelterwood stands on the Appalachian Plateau of northern Pennsylvania: 4-year results. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 3374-3381.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrose, P. H. & D. H. Van Lear. 1998. Responses of hardwood advance regeneration to seasonal prescribed ires in oak dominated shelterwood stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28: 331-339.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrose, P. H., T. M. Schuler & J. S. Ward. 2006. Responses of oak and other hardwood regeneration to prescribed ire: what we know as of 2005. pp. 123- 135. In: M. B. Dickinson (ed.). General Technical Report NRS-P-1. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station. Newtown Square, PA, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrose, P. H., D. Van Lear & P.D. Keyser. 1999a. A Shelterwood-Burn Technique for Regenerating Productive Upland Oak Sites in the Piedmont Region. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 23: 158-163.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrose, P. H., D. H. Van Lear & P. D. Keyser. 1999b. A shelterwood-burn technique for regenerating productive upland oak sites in the Piedmont region. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 23: 158-163.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrose, P. H., T. M. Schuler, D. H. Van Lear & J. Berst. 2001. Bringing ire back: the changing regimes of the Appalachian mixed-oak forests. Journal of Forestry 99: 30-35.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrose, P. H., K. W. Gottschalk, S. B. Horsley, P. D. Knopp, J. N. Kochenderfer, B. J. McGuinness, G. W. Miller, T. E. Ristau, S. H. Stoleson & S. L. Stout. 2008. Prescribing regeneration treatments for mixed-oak forests in the Mid Atlantic Region. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station. General Technical Report NRS-33. Newtown Square, PA, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrown, M. D. 1997. The Montreal process: Criteria and indicators for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests, pp. 54-57. In: Penn State School of Forest Resources issues conference - Forest sustainability: What's it all about?. Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurns, R. M. & B. H. Honkala. 1990. Silvics of North America. Vol. 2. Hardwoods. Washington: USDA Handbook 654.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrawford, H. S., R. G. Hooper & W. W. Titterington. 1981. Songbird population response to silvicultural practices in central Appalachian hardwoods. Journal of Wildlife Management 45: 680-692.spa
dc.relation.referencesCrow, T. R. 1992. Population dynamics and growth patterns for a cohort of northern red oak (Quercus rubra) seedlings. Oecologia 91: 192-200. DeMaynadier, P. G. & M. L. Hunter Jr. 1995.spa
dc.relation.referencesDennis, T. L. 2002. Responses of avian communities to shelterwood cuts and prescribed burns in eastern deciduous forests. MS. Ohio University, Athens, OH. USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesDey, D. C. 2002. Fire history and postsettlement disturbance, pp. 46-59. In: W.J. McShea & W.M. Healy (eds.). Oak forest ecosystems ecology and management for wildlife. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, MD, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesDey, D. C. & Z. Fan. 2009. A review of ire and oak regeneration and overstory recruitment, pp. 2-20. In: T. F. Hutchinson (ed.). Proceedings 3rd ire in eastern oak forests conference. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station. Newtown Square, PA, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesDey, D. C. & R. P. Guyette. 2000. Sustaining oak ecosystems in the Central Hardwood Region: lessons from the past - continuing the history of disturbance, pp. 170-183. In: Transactions 65th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference.spa
dc.relation.referencesDey, D. C. & R. P. Guyette. 2000. Anthropogenic ire history and red aok forests in south-central Ontario. The Forestry Chronicle 76: 339-347.spa
dc.relation.referencesDey, D. C. & G. Hartman. 2005. Returning ire to Ozark Highland forest ecosystems: effects on advance regeneration. Forest Ecology and Management 217: 37-53.spa
dc.relation.referencesDey, D. C. & W.C. Parker. 1996. Regeneration of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) using shelterwood systems: ecophysiology, silviculture and management recommendations. Forest Research Information Paper No. 126. Ontario Forest Research Institute. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Sault Ste. Marie, ON, CA. 59 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesDey, D. C. & W. C. Parker. 1997. Morphological indicators of stock quality and ield performance of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings underplanted in a central Ontario shelterwood. New Forests 14: 145-156.spa
dc.relation.referencesDey, D. C., P.S. Johnson & H.E. Garrett. 1996a. Modeling the regeneration of oak stands in the Missouri Ozark Highlands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26 :573-583.spa
dc.relation.referencesDey, D. C., Ter-Mikaelian, P. S. Johnson & S. R. Shiley. 1996b. User's guide to ACORn: a comprehensive Ozark regeneration simulator. USDA Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment Station. General Technical Report NC-180. St. Paul, MN, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesDey, D. C., D. Jacobs, K. McNabb, G. Miller, V. Baldwin & G. Foster. 2008. Artiicial regeneration of major oak (Quercus) species in the eastern United States - a review of the literature. Forest Science 54: 77-106.spa
dc.relation.referencesDowns, A. A. & W. E. McQuilken. 1944. Seed production of southern Appalachian oaks. Journal of Forestry 42: 913-920.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuguay, J. P. & P. B. Wood. 2002. Salamander abundance in regenerating forest stands on the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Forest Science 48: 331-335.spa
dc.relation.referencesElliott, K. J., R. L. Hendrick, A. E. Major, J. M. Vose & W. T. Swank. 1999. Vegetation dynamics after a prescribed ire in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management 114: 199-213.spa
dc.relation.referencesFischer, B. C. 1981. Designing forest openings for the group selection method. pp. 274-277. In: General Technical Report SO-34. USDA Forest Service Southern Forest Experiment Station. New Orleans, LA, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesFord, W. M., M. A. Menzel, D. W. McGill, J. Laerm & T. S. McCay. 1999. Effects of a community restoration ire on small mammals and herpetofauna in the southern Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management 114: 233-243.spa
dc.relation.referencesFord, W. M. & J. L. Rodriguez. 2001. Soricid abundance in partial overstory removal harvests and riparian areas in an industrial forest landscape of the central Appalachians. Forest Ecology and Management 152: 159-168.spa
dc.relation.referencesFranklin, S. B., P.A. Robertson & J. S. Fralish. 2003. Prescribed burning effects on upland Quercus forest structure and function. Forest Ecology and Management 184: 315-335.spa
dc.relation.referencesGardiner, E. S. & J. D. Hodges. 1998. Growth and biomass distribution of cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda Raf.) seedlings as inluenced by light availability. Forest Ecology and Management 108: 127-131.spa
dc.relation.referencesGardiner, E. S. & J. L. Yeiser. 2006. Underplanting cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda Raf.) seedlings on a bottomland site in the southern United States. New Forests 32: 105-119.spa
dc.relation.referencesGilliam, F. S. 2007. The ecological signiicance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. BioScience 57: 845-858.spa
dc.relation.referencesGottschalk, K. W. 1987. Effects of shading on growth and development of northern red oak, black oak, black cherry, and red maple seedlings. II. biomass partitioning and prediction, pp. 99-110. In: R.L. Hay & F.W. DeSelm (eds.). Proceedings 6th Central hardwood forest conference. University of Tennessee. Knoxville, TN, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesGottschalk, K. W. 1994. Shade, leaf growth and crown development of Quercus rubra, Quercus velutina, Prunus serotina, and Acer rubrum seedlings. Tree Physiology 14: 735-749.spa
dc.relation.referencesGreenberg, C. H. & T. A. Waldrop. 2008. Shortterm response of reptiles and amphibians to prescribed ire and mechanical fuel reduction in a southern Appalachian upland hardwood forest. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 2883-2893.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuyette, R. P., R. M. Muzika & D. C. Dey. 2002. Dynamics of an anthropogenic ire regime. Ecosystems 5: 472-486.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuyette, R. P., D. C. Dey, M. C. Stambaugh & R-M. Muzika. 2005. Fire scars reveal variability and dynamics of eastern ire regimes, pp. 20-39. In: M.B. Dickinson (ed.). Fire in eastern oak forests: delivering science to land managers. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station General Technical Report NRSP-1. Newtown Square, PA, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesHamel, P. B. 2004. Suggestions for a silvicultural prescription for Cerulean Warblers in the lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, pp. 567-575. In: C. J. Ralph & T. D. Rich (eds.). Bird Conservation Implementation and Integration in the Americas: Proceedings of the Third International Partners in Flight Conference. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-191. Asolimar, CA. USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesHanson, P. J., J. G. Isebrands & R. E. Dickson. 1987. Carbon budgets of Quercus rubra L. seedlings at selected stages of growth: inluence of light, pp. 269-276. In: R.L. Hay & F.W. DeSelm (eds.). Proceedings 6th Central hardwood forest conference. University of Tennessee. Knoxville, TN, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarpole, D. N. & C.A. Haas. 1999. Effects of seven silvicultural treatments on terrestrial salamanders. Forest Ecology and Management 114: 349-356.spa
dc.relation.referencesHartman, G. W. & B. Heumann. 2004. Prescribed ire effects in the Ozarks of Missouri: the Chilton Creek Project 1996-2001, pp. 16-20. In: Proceedings, 2nd International Wildland Fire Ecology and Fire Management Congress, Orlando, FL, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesHengst, G. E. & J. O. Dawson. 1994. Bark properties and ire resistance of selected tree species from the central hardwood region of North America. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24: 688-696.spa
dc.relation.referencesHodges, J. D. & E. S. Gardiner. 1993. Ecology and physiology of oak regeneration. pp. 5465. In: D. L. Loftis & C. E. McGee (eds.). Oak regeneration: serious problems, practical recommendations. USDA Forest Service Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. Asheville, NC, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesHunter, M. L. 1999. Maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.spa
dc.relation.referencesHutchinson, T. F. 2006. Fire and the herbaceous layer of eastern oak forests, pp. 136-149 In: M. B. Dickinson (ed.). Fire in Eastern Oak Forests: Delivering Science to Land Managers. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Columbus, OH. USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesHutchinson, T. F. & S. Sutherland. 2000. Fire and Understory Vegetation: A Large-scale Study in Ohio and a Search for General Response Patterns in Central Hardwood Forests. In: D. A. Yaussy (compiler). USDA Forest Service General Technical Report GTR-NE-274. Newtown Square, PA, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesHutchinson, T. F., R. E. J. Boerner, S. Sutherland, E. K. Sutherland, M. Ortt & L. R. Iverson. 2005. Prescribed ire effects on the herbaceous layer of mixed-oak forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: 877-890.spa
dc.relation.referencesIverson, L. R. & T. F. Hutchinson. 2002. Soil temperature and moisture luctuations during and after prescribed ire in mixed-oak forests, USA. Natural Areas Journal. 22: 296-304.spa
dc.relation.referencesJenkins, M. A. & G. R. Parker. 1998. Composition and diversity of woody vegetation in silvicultural openings of southern Indiana forests. Forest Ecology and Management 109: 57-74.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, P. S. 1974. Survival and growth of northern red oak seedlings following a prescribed burn. p. 3. Research Note NC-177. USDA Forest Service North Central Forest Experiment Station. St. Paul, MN, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, P. S. 1992. Oak overstory/reproduction relations in two xeric ecosystems in Michigan. Forest Ecology and Management 48: 233-248.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohnson, P. S., S. R. Shiley & R. Rogers. 2009. The ecology and silviculture of oaks. 2nd edition. CABI Publishing. New York, NY, USA. 560 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesJolls, C.L. 2003. Populations of and threats to rare plants of the herb layer, pp. 105-159. In: F. S. Gilliam & M. R. Roberts (eds.). The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. Oxford University Press. New York, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesKeeley, J. E., A. H. Pfaff & H. D. Safford. 2005. Fire suppression impacts on postire recovery of Sierra Nevada chaparral shrublands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 14: 255-265.spa
dc.relation.referencesKeyser, P. D. & W. M. Ford. 2005. Inluence of ire on mammals in eastern oak forests. pp. 180-190. In: M.B. Dickinson (ed.). Fire in Eastern Oak Forests: Delivering Science to Land Managers. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Columbus, OH, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesKeyser, P. D., D. J. Sausville, W. M. Ford, D. J. Schwab & P. H. Brose. 2004. Prescribed Fire Impacts to Amphibians and Reptiles in Shelterwood-harvested Oak-dominated Forests. Virginia Journal of Science 55: 159-168.spa
dc.relation.referencesKier, G., J. Mutke, E. Dinerstein, T. H. Ricketts, W. Kuper, H. Kreft & W. Barthlott. 2005. Global patterns of plant diversity and loristic knowledge. Journal of Biogeography 32: 1107-1116.spa
dc.relation.referencesKiester, A. R. 1971. Species density of North American amphibians and reptiles. Systematic Zoology 20: 127-137.spa
dc.relation.referencesKing, D. I. & R. M. DeGraaf. 2000. Bird species diversity and nesting success in mature, clearcut and shelterwood forest in northern New Hampshire. Forest Ecology and Management 129: 227-235.spa
dc.relation.referencesKirkland, G. L., Jr. 1990. Patterns of initial small mammal community change after clearcutting of temperate North American forests. Oikos 59: 313-320.spa
dc.relation.referencesKnapp, S. M., C. A. Haas, D. N. Harpole & R. L. Kirkpatrick. 2003. Initial effects of clearcutting and alternative silvicultural practices on terrestrial salamander abundance. Conservation Biology 17: 752-762.spa
dc.relation.referencesKochenderfer, J. D., S. M. Zedaker, J. E. Johnson, D. W. Smith & G. W. Miller. 2001. Herbicide hardwood crop tree release in central West Virginia. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 18: 46-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesKolb, T. E. & K. C. Steiner. 1990. Growth and biomass partitioning of northern red oak and yellow-poplar seedlings: effects of shading and grass root competition. Forest Science 36: 34-44.spa
dc.relation.referencesKrech, S., III. 1999. The ecological Indian myth and history.. W.W. Norton & Co. New York, NY, USA. 318 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuddes-Fischer, L. M. & M. A. Arthur. 2002. Response of understory vegetation and tree regeneration to a single prescribed ire in oakpine forests. Natural Areas Journal 22: 43-52.spa
dc.relation.referencesLarsen, D. R., M. A. Metzger & P. S. Johnson. 1997. Oak regeneration and overstory density in the Missouri Ozarks. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 869-875.spa
dc.relation.referencesLindenmayer, D. B., C. R. Margules & D. B. Botkin. 2000. Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conservation Biology 14: 941.spa
dc.relation.referencesLitvaitis, J. A. 2001. Importance of early-successional habitats to mammals in eastern forests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 466-473.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoftis, D. L. 1988. Regenerating oaks on high quality sites, an update, pp. 199-209. In: H.C. Smith, A.W. Perkey & W.E. Kidd, Jr. (eds.). Proceedings, guidelines for regenerating Appalachian hardwood stands. Society of American Foresters Publication 88-03. Washington, DC, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoftis, D. L. 1990a. Predicting post-harvest performance of advance red oak reproduction in the southern Appalachians. Forest Science 36: 908-916.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoftis, D. L. 1990b. A shelterwood method for regenerating red oak in the southern Appalachians. Forest Science 36: 917-929.spa
dc.relation.referencesLogan, W. B. 2005. Oak the frame of civilization. New York, NY, USA: W.W. Norton Co.spa
dc.relation.referencesLorimer, C. G., J. W. Chapman & W. D. Lambert. 1994. Tall understorey vegetation as a factor in the poor development of oak seedlings beneath mature stands. Journal of Ecology 82: 227-237.spa
dc.relation.referencesMatthews, C. E., C. E. Moorman, C. H. Greenberg & T. A. Waldrop. 2009. Response of soricid populations to repeated ire and fuel reduction treatments in the southern Appalachian Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 1939-1944.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcLeod, R. F. & J. E. Gates. 2009. Response of herpetofaunal communities to forest cutting and burning at Chesapeake Farms, Maryland. The American Midland Naturalist 139: 164-177.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcShea, W. J., W. M. Healy, P. Devers, T. Fearer, F. H. Koch, D. Stauffer & J. Waldon. 2007. Forestry matters: Decline of oaks will impact wildlife in hardwood forests. Journal of Wildlife Management 71: 1717-1728.spa
dc.relation.referencesMeier, A. J., S. P. Bratton & D. C. Duffy. 1995. Possible ecological mechanisms for loss of vernal-herb diversity in logged eastern deciduous forests. Ecological Applications 5: 935-946.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller, G. W., J. N. Kochenderfer & K. W. Gottschalk. 2004. Effect of pre-harvest shade control and fencing on northern red oak seedling development in the central Appalachians, pp. 182-189. In: M. A. Spetich (ed.). Upland oak ecology symposium. General Technical Report SRS-73. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station. Asheville, NC, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller, G. W., J. W. Stringer & D. C. Mercker. 2008. Technical guide to crop tree release in hardwood forests. p. 23. University of Kentucky, Cooperative Extension Publication FOR-106. Lexington, KY, USA. Cooperative Extension Publication FOR-106.spa
dc.relation.referencesMoola, F. M. & L. Vasseur. 2008. The maintenance of understory residual lora with even-aged forest management: A review of temperate forests in northeastern North America. Environmental Reviews 16: 141-155.spa
dc.relation.referencesMotsinger, J. 2006. Response of natural and artiicial pin oak reproduction to mid- and understory removal in a bottomland forest. MSc. Thesis. University of Missouri. Columbia, MO, USA. 79 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesNowacki, G. J. & M. D. Abrams. 2008. The demise of ifre and "mesophication" of forests in the eastern United States. BioScience 58: 123-138.spa
dc.relation.referencesOwen, S. F., M. A. Menzel, J. W. Edwards, W. M. Ford, J. M. Menzel, B. R. Chapman, P. B. Wood & K. V. Miller. 2004. Bat activity in harvested and intact forest stands in the Allegheny Mountains. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 21: 154-159.spa
dc.relation.referencesParker, W. C. & D. C. Dey. 2008. Inluence of overstory density on ecophysiology of red oak (Quercus rubra) and sugar maple (Acer sacchaurm) seedlings in central Ontario shelterwoods. Tree Physiology 28: 797-804.spa
dc.relation.referencesPatrick, D. A., M. L. Hunter, Jr. & A. J. K. Calhoun. 2006. Effects of experimental forestry treatments on a Maine amphibian community. Forest Ecology and Management 234: 323-332.spa
dc.relation.referencesPeet, R. K. & N. L. Christensen. 1988. Changes in species diversity during secondary forest succession on the North Carolina Piedmont, pp. 233-245. In: H. J. During, M. J. A. Werger & H. J. Willems (eds.). Diversity and pattern in plant communities. SPB Academic Publishing. The Hague, Netherlands.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerison, D., J. Phelps, C. Pavel & R. Kellison. 1997. The effects of timber harvest in a South Carolina blackwater bottomland. Forest Ecology and Management 90: 171-185.spa
dc.relation.referencesPhillips, R., T. F. Hutchinson, L. Brudnak & T. Waldrop. 2007. Fire and ire surrogate treatments in mixed-oak forests: Effects on herbaceous layer vegetation. pp. 475-485. In: B.W. Butler & W. Cook (eds.). The ire environment-innovations, management, and policy. USDA Forest Service, Destin, FL, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesPowell, L. A., J. D. Lang, M. J. Conroy & D. G. Krementz. 2000. Effects of forest management on density, survival, and population growth of wood thrushes. Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 11-23.spa
dc.relation.referencesPyne, S. J. 1982. Fire in America. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ, USA.654 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesRenken, R. B. 2005. Does ire affect amphibians and reptiles in eastern US oak forests? pp. 158166. In: M.B. Dickinson (ed.). Fire in Eastern Oak Forests: Delivering Science to Land Managers. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Columbus, OH, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesRicketts, T. H., E. Dinerstein, D.M. Olson & C. Loucks. 1999. Who's where in North America? BioScience 49: 369-381.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, M. R. 2004. Response of the herbaceous layer to natural disturbance in North American forests. Canadia Journal of Botany 82: 1273-1283.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, M. R. 2007. A conceptual model to characterize disturbance severity in forest harvests. Forest Ecology and Management 242: 58-64.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, M. R. & F. S. Gilliam. 1995. Patterns and mechanisms of plant diversity in forested ecosystems: implications for forest management. Ecological Applications 5: 969-977.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, M. R. & F. S. Gilliam. 1995. Patterns and mechanisms of plant diversity in forested ecosystems: implications for forest management. Ecological Applications 5: 969-977.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts, M. R. & F. S. Gilliam. 2003. Response of the herbaceous layer to disturbance in eastern forests, pp. 301-320. In: F.S. Gilliam & M.R. Roberts (eds.). The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America. Oxford University Press. New York, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodewald, A. D. 2003. Decline of oak forests and implications for forest wildlife conservation. Natural Areas Journal 23: 368-371.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodewald, A. D. & M. D. Abrams. 2002. Floristics and avian community structure: implications for regional changes in eastern forest composition. Forest Science 48: 267-272.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodewald, P. G. & K. G. Smith. 1998. Short-term effects of understory and overstory management on breeding birds in Arkansas oak-hickory forests. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 1411-1417.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodewald, A. D. & R. H. Yahner. 2001. Avian nesting success in forested landscapes: inluence of landscape composition, stand and nestpatch microhabitat, and biotic interactions. Auk. 118: 1018-1028.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoss, B. D., M. L. Morrison, W. Hoffman, T. S. Fredericksen, R. J. Sawicki, E. Ross, M. B. Lester, J. Beyea & B. N. Johnson. 2001. Bird relationships to habitat characteristics created by timber harvesting in Pennsylvania. Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Sciences 74: 71-84.spa
dc.relation.referencesRowland, E. L., A. S. White & W. H. Livingston. 2005. A literature review of the effects of intensive forestry on forest structure and plant community composition at the stand and landscape levels. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station. Miscellaneous publication 754. USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoyo, A. A. & W. P. Carson. 2006. On the formation of dense understory layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 1345-1362.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoyo, A. A., R. Collins, M. B. Adams, C. Kirschbaum & W. P. Carson. 2010. Pervasive interactions between ungulate browsers and disturbance regimes promote temperate forest herbaceous diversity. Ecology 91(1): 93-105.spa
dc.relation.referencesRubbo, M. J. & J. M. Kiesecker. 2004. Leaf litter composition and community structure: translating regional species changes into local dynamics. Ecology 85: 2519-2525.spa
dc.relation.referencesRussell, K. R., T. B. Wigley, W. M. Baughman, H. G. Hanlin & W. M. Ford. 2004. Responses of southeastern amphibians and reptiles to forest management: a review. pp. 319-334. In: H.M. Rauscher & K. Johnsen (eds.). Southern forest science: past, present, and future. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS-75. Ashville, NC, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesSallabanks, R., E. B. Arnett & J. M. Marzuff. 2000. An evaluation of research on the effects of timber harvest on bird populations. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 1144-1155.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchiffman, P. M. & W. C. Johnson. 1992. Sparse buried seed bank in a southern Appalachian oak forest: Implications for succession. American Midland Naturalist. 127: 258-267.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchlesinger, R. C., I. L. Sander & K. R. Davidson. 1993. Oak regeneration potential increased by shelterwood treatments. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 10: 149-153.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt, K. M., J. P. Menakis, C. C. Hardy, W. J. Hann & D. L. Bunnell. 2002. Development of coarse-scale spatial data for wildland ire and fuel management. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-87.USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. Fort Collins, CO. 41 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchroeder, M. J. & C. C. Buck. 1970. Fire weather. Agriculture Handbook 360. USDA Forest Service. Washington, DC, USA. 229 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchuler, T. M. 2004. Fifty years of partial harvesting in a mixed mesophytic forest: composition and productivity. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 985-997.spa
dc.relation.referencesSharp, W. M. & V. G. Sprague. 1967. Flowering and fruiting in the white oaks: pistillate lowering, acorn development, weather, and yields. Ecology 48: 243-251.spa
dc.relation.referencesShipman, P. A., S. F. Fox, R. E. Thill, J.P. Phelps & D. M. Leslie, Jr. 1999. Reptile communities under diverse forest management in the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas, pp. 26­28. In: Ouachita and Ozark Mountains symposium: ecosystem management research. USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station. General Technical Report SRS­74.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, D. M., B. C. Larsen, M. J. Kelty & P. M. S. Ashton. 1997. The practice of silviculture: applied forest ecology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA: 537 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesSork, V. L., J. Bramble & O. Sexton. 1993. Ecology of mast-fruiting in three species of North American deciduous oaks. Ecology 74: 528-541.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpetich, M. A., D. C. Dey, P. S. Johnson & D. L. Graney. 2002. Competitive capacity of Quercus rubra L. planted in Arkansas Boston Mountains. Forest Science 48: 504-517.spa
dc.relation.referencesThompson, F. R., III, J. R. Probst & M. G. Raphael. 1995. Impacts of silviculture: overview and management recommendations, pp. 201-219. In: T. E. Martin & D. M. Finch (eds.). Ecology and management of Neotropical migratory birds. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Lear, D. H. & P. H. Brose. 2002. Fire and oak management, pp. 269-279. In: W. J. McShea & W. M. Healy (eds.). Oak forest ecosystems ecology and management for wildlife. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, MD, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesWaldrop, T. A., D. L. White & S. M. Jones. 1992. Fire regimes for pine-grassland communities in the southeastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 47: 195-210.spa
dc.relation.referencesWalters, M. B., E. L. Kruger & P. B. Reich. 1993. Relative growth rate in relation to physiological and morphological traits for northern hardwood tree seedlings: species, light environment and ontogenetic considerations. Oecologia 96: 219-231.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, Y., A. A. Lesak, Z. Felix & C. J. Schweitzer. 2006. A preliminary analysis of the response of an avian community to silvicultural treatments in the southern Cumberland Plateau, Alabama, USA. Integrative Zoology 1: 126-129.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeigel, D. R. & G. R. Parker. 1997. Tree regeneration response to the group selection method in southern Indiana. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 14: 90-94.spa
dc.relation.referencesWestin, S. 1992. Wildire in Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation. Jefferson City, MO, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhigham, D. F. 2004. Ecology of woodland herbs in temperate deciduous forests. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 583-621.spa
dc.relation.referencesWilliams, M. 1989. Americans and their forests: a historical geography. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK. 599 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesZenner, E. K., J. M. Kabrick, R. G. Jensen, J. E. Peck & J. K. Grabner. 2006. Responses of ground lora to a gradient of harvest intensity in the Missouri Ozarks. Forest Ecology and Management 222: 326-334.spa
dc.relation.referencesZwolak, R. 2009. A meta-analysis of the effects of wildire, clearcutting, and partial harvest on the abundance of North American small mammals. Forest Ecology and Management 258: 539-545.spa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREVspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationvolume13spa
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 2 , Año 2010 : Julio-Diciembrespa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalColombia forestalspa
dc.identifier.eissn2256-201X
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2010.2.a02
dc.relation.citationstartpage201
dc.relation.citationendpage222
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/download/3454/4975
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/download/3454/5170
dc.type.contentTextspa
dspace.entity.typePublicationspa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/