Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorDávila, Esteban Alvarezspa
dc.contributor.authorDuque, Alexandraspa
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Wilsonspa
dc.contributor.authorLema, Álvarospa
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-19T21:07:33Z
dc.date.available2013-07-01 00:00:00
dc.date.available2023-09-19T21:07:33Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-01
dc.identifier.issn0120-0739
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/44356
dc.description.abstractEn este trabajo analizamos la relación entre variables a escala del paisaje (área del fragmento, forma, conectividad, altitud, contraste de borde, tipo de bosque, etc.) y la riqueza de plantas vasculares en un bosque andino del norte de Colombia. Con base en un mapa de vegetación escala 1:10.000, seleccionamos 39 fragmentos al azar (de un total de 700) y en cada uno de ellos establecimos al menos una parcela de 200 m2 donde se contó el número total de especies de plantas vasculares. La muestra estuvo constituida por fragmentos entre 1 ha y 840 ha distribuidos en un gradiente altitudinal entre los 1800 y 2800 msnm. En las 60 parcelas establecidas (1.2 ha en total) encontramos  108 familias, 259 géneros y 556 especies de plantas vasculares, demostrando la alta biodiversidad que pueden albergar los bosques fragmentados de los andes. La riqueza de especies estuvo entre 34 y 74 por parcela de 200 m2. El análisis mostró que las variables individuales más relacionadas con la riqueza de especies (de acuerdo con el coeficiente r de Pearson) son el área total del fragmento (r = 0.43, p<0.001, n = 60), el área central del fragmento (r = 0.49, p<0.001, n = 60) y el contraste de borde del fragmento (r = - 0.48, p<0.001, n = 60). Finalmente, construimos diferentes modelos de regresión múltiple que explican hasta el 32.6 % de la variación de la riqueza de especies de cada fragmento. Discutimos la utilidad del modelo para la identificación prioridades de conservación a pequeña escala.spa
dc.description.abstractWe analyse the relationship between landscapescale variables (fragment area, shape, connectivity, altitude, edge contrast, forest type, etc.) and vascular plant richness in an Andean forest of northern Colombia. Using a vegetation map at a scale of 1:10000, we randomly selected 39 fragments (from a total of 700) in each of which we established a 200 m2 plot where we counted the total number of species of vascular plants. The sample consisted of fragments of between one ha and 840 ha at altitudes of between 1800 and 2800 m. In the 60 plots (1,2 ha in total) we found 108 families, 259 genera and 556 species of vascular plants. Species richness varied between 34 and 74 per 200 m2 plot. The analysis showed that the individual variables most closely related to species richness (according to the Pearson r coefficient) are the total area of the fragment (r = 0,43, p <0,001, n = 60), the central area of the fragment (r = 0,49, p <0,001, n = 60) and the fragment edge contrast (r = - 0,48, p <0,00, n = 60). Finally, we built multiple regression models to explain up to 32,6 % of the variation in species richness of each fragment. We discuss the usefulness of these models for the identification of small scale conservation priorities.eng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.format.mimetypetext/htmlspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldasspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/view/4954spa
dc.subjectAndesspa
dc.subjectColombiaspa
dc.subjectfragmentaciónspa
dc.subjectheterogeneidad ambientalspa
dc.subjectplantas vascularesspa
dc.subjectpredicción de la riquezaspa
dc.titleImpacto de la fragmentación en la diversidad de plantas vasculares en bosques andinos del nororiente de Colombiaspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.identifier.doi10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2013.2.a01
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.localJournal articleeng
dc.title.translatedImpact of fragmentation on vascular plant diversity in an andean forest in northeastern Colombiaeng
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez, E. (1997). Power Lines and Biodiversity in the Colombian Territory. In: Proceedings The Sixth International Symposium on Environmental Concerns in Rights-of-Way Management: 24-26 February 1997, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd, (p. 343-352).spa
dc.relation.referencesÁlvarez, E. (2009). Oportunidades para la conservación de la biodiversidad en proyectos de desarrollo en Colombia. Revista Eólo, 14, 161-182.spa
dc.relation.referencesArroyo-Rodríguez, V., Pineda, E., Escobar, F. & Benítez-Malvido, J. (2009). Value of small patches in the conservation to plant-species diversity in highly fragmented rainforest. Conservation Biology 23,729–739.spa
dc.relation.referencesÅs, S. (1999). Invasion of matrix species in small habitat patches. Conservation Ecology [online] 3(1), 1. Available from the Internet. URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/artspa
dc.relation.referencesBarthlott, W., Mutke, J. & Kier, G. (2000). BIOMAPS - Biodiversity mapping for protection and sustainable use of the natural resources. Botanisches Institute uns Botanischer Garten. Rheinische Friederich – Wilhems – Universität Bonn. Absteilung Systematik und Biodiversität. Documento de Internet, sitio Web: http://www.botanik.uni-bonn.de/system/biomaps.html.spa
dc.relation.referencesBierregaard, R.O., Lovejoy, T.E., Kapos, V., Dos Santos, A.A. & Hutchings, R.W.. (1992). The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments. A prospective comparison of fragments and continuous forest. BioScience, 42(11), 859-866.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoone, R.B. & Krohn, W.B. (2000). Predicting broad-scale occurrences of vertebrates in patchy landscapes. Landscape Ecology 15, 63-74.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrunig, E.F.(1973). Species richness and stand diversity in relation to site and succession of forest in Sarawak and Brunei (Borneo). Amazoniana, 3, 293-320.spa
dc.relation.referencesBurnett, M.R., August, P.V., Brown, J.H., & Killingbeck, K.T. (1998). The Influence of Geomorphological Heterogeneity on Biodiversity. I. A Patch-Scale Perspective. Conservation Biology, 12(2), 363-370spa
dc.relation.referencesCagnolo, L., Cabido, M, & Valladares, G. (2006). Plant species richness in the Chaco Serrano Woodland from central Argentina: Ecological traits and habitat fragmentation effects. Biological Conservation, 132, 510–519.spa
dc.relation.referencesCavalier, J. (1997). Selvas y bosques montanos: En: Chaves, M.E. & Arango, N. Diversidad biológica de Colombia. Tomo 1. Isbn: 958-96529-1-3. p. 38.55.spa
dc.relation.referencesCherrill, A.J., McClean, C., Watson, P., Tuckers, K, Rushton, S.P. & Sanderson, R. (1995). Predicting the distribution of plant species at the regional scale: a hierarchical matrix model. Landscape Ecology, 10(4), 197-207.spa
dc.relation.referencesConnell, J. (1978). Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, 199, 1302–1310spa
dc.relation.referencesCorlett, R.T. & Turner, I.M. (1997). Long-term survival in tropical forest remmnats in Singapore and Hong Kong. En: Laurance, W. F. & Bierregaard, R. O. Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented communities. Chicago: University of Chicago. p. 333-346.spa
dc.relation.referencesCowling, R.M. & Samways, M.J. (1995). Predicting patterns of endemic plant species richness. Biodiversity Letter, 2, 127-131spa
dc.relation.referencesDebinski, D.M. & Holt, R.D. (2000). A survey and Overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation biology, 14(2), 342-355.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Toledo, J. J., Magnusson, W.E., Castilho, C.V., Nascimento, H. E. M. (2011). How much variation in tree mortality is predicted by soil and topography in Central Amazonia?. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 331–338spa
dc.relation.referencesDinerstein, E., Olson, D.M., Graham, D.J., Webster, A. L., Primm, S.A., Bookbinder, M.P. & Ledec, G. (1995). A conservation assessment of the terrestrial ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean. The World Bank, Washington, 1995. 129 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesDuivenvoorden, J.F. (1994). Vascular plant species counts in the rain forests of the midlle Caquetá, area, Colombian Amazonia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 3, 685-715.spa
dc.relation.referencesDzwonko, Z. & Loster, S. (1988). Specie richness of small woodlands on the western Carpathian foothills. Vegetation, 76, 15-27.spa
dc.relation.referencesDzwonko, Z. & Loster, S. (1989). Distribution of vascular plant species in small woodlands on the Western Carpathian foothills. Oikos, 56, 77-86.spa
dc.relation.referencesEcheverría, C., A. C. Newton, A. Lara, J. M. Rey-Benayas, & D. Coomes. (2007). Impacts of Forest fragmentation on species composition and forest structure in the temperate landscape of southern Chile. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 426–439.spa
dc.relation.referencesForman, R. T. T. (1995). Land mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 632 p. ISBN 052 1474620.spa
dc.relation.referencesFotogrametría Analítica Ltda (FAL). (1995). Mapa digital de coberturas y uso actual de los suelos en los municipios del altiplano del oriente antioqueño. Santa Fe de Bogotá: MASORA – CORNARE, p. 208spa
dc.relation.referencesFox, J. W. (2013). The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned. Trends in Ecology & Evolution February, Vol. 28, No. 2spa
dc.relation.referencesFranco-Roselli, P., Betancur, J. & Fernández-Alonso, J.L. (1997). Diversidad florística en dos bosques subandinos en el sur de Colombia. Caldasia, 19(1-2), 205-234spa
dc.relation.referencesFrohn, R. C. (1998). Remote sensing for landscape ecology. New metrics indicators for monitoring, modeling, and assessment of ecosystems. Boston: Lewis, 99p. + Figure. ISBN 1-56670-275-5.spa
dc.relation.referencesGale, N. (1997). The relationsnship of canopy gaps and topography in a western Ecuadorian rainforest. En: Gale, N. Modes of tree death in four tropical forests, Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Aarhus, Denmark.spa
dc.relation.referencesGaleano, G., Suárez, S. & Balslev, H. (1998). Vascular plant species count in a wet forest in the Chocó area on the Pacifica coast of Colombia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7, 1563-1575. Gentry, A.H. (1986). Species richness and floristic composition of Chocó region plant communities. Caldasia, 15(71/75): 71-92.spa
dc.relation.referencesGentry, A. & Dodson, C. (1987). Contribution of nontrees to species richness of a tropical rain forest. Biotropica, 19(2), 149-156.spa
dc.relation.referencesGibson, L., Lynam, A. J., Bradshaw, C. J.A., He, F., Bickford, D. P., Woodruff, D. S., Bumrungsri, S. & Laurance, W.F. 2013. Near-Complete Extinction of Native Small Mammal Fauna 25 Years After Forest Fragmentation. Science, 341 (6153), 1508-1510. [DOI:10.1126/science.1240495]spa
dc.relation.referencesGivnish, T. J. (1999). On the causes of gradients in tropical tree diversity. Journal of Ecology, 87, 193-210.spa
dc.relation.referencesGómez-Mora, A.M., Anaya, J.A., Álvarez-Dávila, E. 2005. Análisis de fragmentación de los ecosistemas boscosos en una región de la cordillera central de los andes colombianos. Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín, 4(7), 413-27. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=75004702. Consultado el 17 de noviembre de 2013.spa
dc.relation.referencesGould, W. & Walker, M.D. (1999). Plant species and landscape diversity along an artic river. Journal of Vegetation Science, 10, 537-538spa
dc.relation.referencesGrant, V. (1989). Especiación vegetal. México: Noriega, 587 p. ISBN 0 231 05112 3.spa
dc.relation.referencesFerraz, G., Russell, G.J., Stouffer, P.C., Bierregaard, R.O., Pimm, S.L., & Lovejoy, T.E. (2003). Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 100, 14069–14073.spa
dc.relation.referencesHall, B. J. & Swaine, M. D. (1981). Distribution and ecology of vascular plants in a tropical rain forest: forest vegetation in Ghana. Junk, The Hague.spa
dc.relation.referencesHalley, J.M., Sgardeli, V., & Monokrousos, N. (2013). Species-area relationships and extinction forecasts. Ann N Y Acad Sci.,1286, 50–61. Published online 2013 May 14. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12073.spa
dc.relation.referencesHanski, I., Zurita, G.A., Bellocq, M.I., Rybicki, J. (2013). Species–fragmented area relationship. Proc Natl Acad Sci., 110(31), 12715–12720. Published online 2013 July 15. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311491110spa
dc.relation.referencesHeywood, V.H., Mace, G.M., May, R.M., & Stuart, S.N. (1994). Uncertainties in extinction rates. Nature, 368,105.spa
dc.relation.referencesHelliwell, D.R. (1976). The effects of size and isolation on the conservation value of wooded sites in Britain. Journal of Biogeography, 3, 407-416.spa
dc.relation.referencesHonnay, O., Endels, P., Vereecken, H., & Hermy, M. (1999a). the role of patch area and habitat diversity in explaining native plant species richness in disturbed suburban forst patches in northern Belgium. Diversity and Distributions, 5, 129-141.spa
dc.relation.referencesHonnay, O., Hermy, M., & Coppin, P. (1999b). Impact of habitat quality on forest plant species colonization. Forest Ecology and Management, 115(2-3), 157-170.spa
dc.relation.referencesHulshoff, R. (1995. Landscape indices describing a Dutch landscape. Landscape Ecology 10(2), 101-111spa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Geografico Agustin Codazzi. IGAC - COLOMBIA. (1979). Suelos del Departamento De Antioquia.spa
dc.relation.referencesIverson, L.R. & Prasad, A. (1998). Estimating regional plant biodiversity with GIS modelling. Diversity and Distributions, 4, 49-61.spa
dc.relation.referencesJacquemyn, H., Butaye, J. & Hermy, M. (2001). Forest plant species richness in small, fragmented mixed deciduous forest patches: the role of area, time and dispersal limitation. Journal of Biogeography, 28(6), 801-812.spa
dc.relation.referencesKellman, M. (1996). Redefining roles: plant community reorganization and species preservation in fragmented ecosystems. Global ecology and Biogeography Letters, 5, 111-116.spa
dc.relation.referencesKerr, J. T. (1999). Weal links: “Rapoport´s rule” and large-scale species richness paterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 8, 47-54.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaurance, W. F. et al. (2011).The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: A 32-year investigation. Biological Conservation, 144, 56-67.spa
dc.relation.referencesLaurance, W. F. & Bierregaard, R. O. Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented communities. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1997. p. xi-1.spa
dc.relation.referencesLawton, J.H. (1999). Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos, 84, 177-192.spa
dc.relation.referencesLoreau, M. & Mouquet, N. (1999). Immigration and the maintenance of local species diversity. The American Naturalist, 154(4), 427-440.spa
dc.relation.referencesMcGarigal, K. & Marks, B.J. (1995). Fragstats: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure, Version 2.0, Oregon State University, Corvallis.spa
dc.relation.referencesNewton, A.C., Cayuela, L., Echeverría, C., Armesto, J. J., Del Castillo, R. F., Golicher, D., Geneletti, D., Gonzalez-Espinosa, M., Huth, A., López-Barrera, F., Malizia, L., Manson, R., Premoli, A., Ramírez-Marcial, N., Rey Benayas, J.M., Rüger, N., Smith-Ramírez, C., & Williams-Linera, G. (2009). Toward integrated analysis of human impacts on forest biodiversity: lessons from Latin America. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 2. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art2/spa
dc.relation.referencesNichols, W.F., Killingbeck, K.T. & August, P.V. (1998). The Influence of Geomorphological Heterogeneity on Biodiversity. II. A landscape perspective. Conservation Biology, 12( 2), 371-379.spa
dc.relation.referencesParsons, R.F., & Cameron, D.G. (1974). Maximum plant species diversity in terrestrial communities. Biotropica, 6, 202–203.spa
dc.relation.referencesPhillips, O.L., Hall, P., Gentry, A.H., Sawyer, S.A., & Vazquez, R. (1994). Dynamics and species richness of tropical rain forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 91, 2805-2809.spa
dc.relation.referencesPriego-Santander, A., Moreno-Casasola, P., Palacio-Prieto, J.L., Lópes-Portillo, J-L. & Geissert-Kientz, D. (2003). Relación entre la heterogeneidad del paisaje y la riqueza de especies de flora en cuencas costeras del estado de Veracruz, México. Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín del Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, 52, 31-52.spa
dc.relation.referencesRangel, T.F.L.V.B, Diniz-Filho, J.A.F & Bini, L.M. (2010) SAM: a comprehensive application for Spatial Analysis in Macroecology. Ecography, 33, 46-50.spa
dc.relation.referencesRodhe, K. (1992). Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos, 65, 514-527.spa
dc.relation.referencesShafer, C.L. (1995). Values of shortcomings of small reserves. Bioscience, 45, 80-88. Shmida, A. & Wilson, M.W. (1985). Biological determinants of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 12, 1-20.spa
dc.relation.referencesSiemman, E., Tilman, D., Haarstad, J. & Ritchie, M. (1998). Experimental test of the dependence of arthropod diversity on plant diversity. The American Naturalist, 152(5), 738-750.spa
dc.relation.referencesSlik, J.W. F., Aiba, S-I, Brearley, F.Q., Cannon, C.H., Forshed, O., Kitayama, K., Nagamasu, H., Nilus, R., Payne, J., Paoli, G., Poulsen, A.D., Raes, N., Sheil, D., Sidiyasa, K., Suzuki, E., & Van Valkenburg, J. L. C. H. (2010). Environmental correlates of tree biomass, basal area, wood specific gravity, and stem density gradients in Borneo tropical forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr, 19, 50–60.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, A. P. (1988). Does correlation of Elevation with plant taxonomic richness vary with latitude?. Biotropica, 20(3): 259-261.spa
dc.relation.referencesTischendorf, L. & Fahrig, L. (2000). On the usage ande measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 90, 7-19.spa
dc.relation.referencesTurner, I. M. & Corlett, R. T. (1996). The conservation of small, isolated fragments of lowland tropical rain forest. TREE, 11(8), 330-333.spa
dc.relation.referencesWeaver, M. & Kellman, M. (1981). The effects of forest fragmentation on woodland tree biotas in Southern Ontario. Journal of biogeography, 8, 199-210spa
dc.relation.referencesViana V.M., Tabanez A.J. & Batista, J.L. (1997). Dynamics and restoration of forest fragments in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. In: Laurence W.F. & Bierregaard R.O. Jr. (eds) Tropical Forest Remnants:Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 351–365.spa
dc.relation.referencesWebb, L. J., Tracey, J. G., Williams, W.T. & Lance. G. N. (1967). Studies in the numerical analysis of complex rain forest communities: I. A comparison of methods applicable to site/species data. Journal of Ecology, 55, 171-191.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhitmore, T. C. (1997). Tropical forest disturbance, Disappearance, and species loss. En: Laurance, W. F. & Bierregaard, R. O. Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented communities. Chicago: University of Chicago, p. 3-12.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhitmore, T. C., Peralta, R. & Brown, K. (1985). Total species count in a Costa Rican rainforest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 1, 375-378.spa
dc.relation.referencesWohlgemuth, T. (1998). Modelling floristic species richness on a regional scale: a case study in Switzerand. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7, 159-177.spa
dc.relation.referencesYepes-Quintero, A.P., Jaramillo-Restrepo, S.L., Del Valle-Arango, J.I., & Orrego-Suáza, S.A. (2007). Diversidad y composición florística en bosques sucesionales andinos de la región del río Porce, Colombia. Actual Biol., 29(86), 107-117.spa
dc.relation.referencesZacharias D., & Brandes, D. (1990). Species area-relationships and frequency – Floristical data analysis of 44 isolated woods in northwestern Germany. Vegetatio, 88, 21-29.spa
dc.relation.referencesZelený, D., Li, C.F. & Chytry, M. (2010). Pattern of local plant species richness along a gradient of landscape topographical heterogeneity: result of spatial mass effect or environmental shift?. Ecography, 33, 578 -589. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05762.xspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.relation.citationvolume16spa
dc.relation.citationissue2spa
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 2 , Año 2013 : Julio-Diciembrespa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalColombia forestalspa
dc.identifier.eissn2256-201X
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2013.2.a01
dc.relation.citationstartpage115
dc.relation.citationendpage137
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/download/4954/6981
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.udistrital.edu.co/index.php/colfor/article/download/4954/6989
dc.type.contentTextspa
dspace.entity.typePublicationspa


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/