Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Intentional Variation in Morally Relevant Theory of Mind (MoToM) Tasks

Variación intencional en tareas de Teoría de la Mente Moralmente relevante (MoToM)

dc.creatorGoenaga, Jesús
dc.creatorSierra, Daniel
dc.creatorGallego, Federico
dc.creatorArtunduaga, Karen
dc.date2020-06-05
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T19:43:37Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T19:43:37Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/CHP/article/view/3050
dc.identifier10.18270/chps..v18i2.3050
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/9855
dc.descriptionThe relationship between the Theory of Mind (ToM) and moral judgment allowed the design of Morally Relevant Theory of Mind (MoToM) tasks, which integrate intentional reading to the elaboration of such judgments. This paper describes the production of a MoToM variation in the moral judgment with intentional reading by children of 5 and 8 years old. They applied a MoToM task and its variation, giving two estimates of moral judgment both before and after the variation. Significant differences were found between ages before the elaboration of the variation. The relationship between ToM and moral judgment was confirmed, recognizing other aspects of development which are significant for the integration of intentionality in making judgments.en-US
dc.descriptionLa relación entre Teoría de la Mente (ToM) y juicio moral permitió el diseño de tareas de Teoría de la Mente Moralmente Relevantes (MoToM), las cuales integran la lectura intencional a la elaboración de dichos juicios. Este trabajo describe la producción de una variación de la MoToM en el juicio moral con lectura intencional en niños de 5 y 8 años, quienes aplicaron una tarea de MoToM y variación de esta, otorgando dos estimaciones del juicio moral, antes y después de la variación. Se encontraron diferencias significativas entre edades ante la elaboración del juicio. Se confirmó la relación entre ToM y juicio moral, reconociendo otros aspectos del desarrollo, los cuales son fundamentales para la integración de la intencionalidad en la elaboración de juicios.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherwww.unbosque.edu.coes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unbosque.edu.co/index.php/CHP/article/view/3050/2356
dc.relation/*ref*/Abu-Akel, A. (2018). The case for simulation theory and theory- theory as interaction accounts of theory of Mind. Constructivist Foundations, 14(1), 33-34. https://constructivist.info/14/1/033.abu-akel
dc.relation/*ref*/Apperly, I. A. (2008). Beyond simulation–theory and theory–theory: why social cognitive neuroscience should use its own concepts to study “Theory of Mind”. Cognition, 107(1), 266-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.019
dc.relation/*ref*/Ball, C. L., Smetana, J. G., & Sturge‐Apple, M. L. (2017). Following my head and my heart: Integrating preschoolers' empathy, theory of mind, and moral judgments. Child Development, 88(2), 597-611. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12605
dc.relation/*ref*/Barclay, P. (2015). Reputation. En Buss, D (Ed) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, (pp. 810-828). Wiley. http://www.patbarclay.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Barclay-Reputation-sending-version.pdf
dc.relation/*ref*/Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
dc.relation/*ref*/Bloom, P., & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition, 77(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00096-2
dc.relation/*ref*/Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind & Language, 28(5), 606-637 https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12036
dc.relation/*ref*/Bzdok, D., Schilbach, L., Vogeley, K., Schneider, K., Laird, A. R., Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2012). Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy. Brain Structure and Function, 217(4), 783-796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0380-y
dc.relation/*ref*/Chakroff, A., Dungan, J., Koster-Hale, J., Brown, A., Saxe, R., & Young, L. (2016). When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(3), 476-484. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv131
dc.relation/*ref*/Cushman, F., Sheketoff, R., Wharton, S., & Carey, S. (20 13). The development of intent-based moral judgment. Cognition, 127(1), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.008
dc.relation/*ref*/D'Esterre, A. P., Rizzo, M. T., & Killen, M. (2019). Unintentional and intentional falsehoods: The role of morally relevant theory of mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 177, 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.07.013
dc.relation/*ref*/Fu, G., Xiao, W. S., Killen, M., & Lee, K. (2014). Moral judgment and its relation to second-order theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 50(8), 2085. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037077
dc.relation/*ref*/Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2016). Foreign language affects the contribution of intentions and outcomes to moral judgment. Cognition, 154, 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.010
dc.relation/*ref*/Goenaga, J. (2016). Revisión sistemática sobre juicio moral en toma de decisiones morales (2005-2015). Tesis de Maestría en Psicología. Medellín: Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Antioquia.
dc.relation/*ref*/Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9
dc.relation/*ref*/Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
dc.relation/*ref*/Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814273.055
dc.relation/*ref*/Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., Richardson, C., Jampol, N., & Woodward, A. (2011). The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind. Cognition, 119(2), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.006
dc.relation/*ref*/Koster-Hale, J., Saxe, R., Dungan, J., & Young, L. L. (2013). Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201207992. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207992110
dc.relation/*ref*/Kuntoro, I. A., Dwiputri, G., & Adams, P. (2018). The contribution of parenting style and theory of mind to the understanding of morally relevant theory of mind in Indonesian children. Diversity in Unity: Perspectives from Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 83 - 89. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315225302-11
dc.relation/*ref*/Lane, J. D., Wellman, H. M., Olson, S. L., LaBounty, J., & Kerr, D. C. (2010). Theory of mind and emotion understanding predict moral development in early childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 871-889. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009x483056
dc.relation/*ref*/Li, L., Rizzo, M. T., Burkholder, A. R., & Killen, M. (2017). Theory of mind and resource allocation in the context of hidden inequality. Cognitive Development, 43, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.02.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Margoni, F., & Surian, L. (2017). Children’s intention-based moral judgments of helping agents. Cognitive Development, 41, 46-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.12.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Miller, S. A. (2009). Children’s understanding of second-order mental states. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 749. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016854
dc.relation/*ref*/Monin, B., Pizarro, D. A., & Beer, J. S. (2007). Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate. Review of general psychology, 11(2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.99
dc.relation/*ref*/Moran, J. M. (2013). Lifespan development: The effects of typical aging on theory of mind. Behavioural Brain Research, 237, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.020
dc.relation/*ref*/Nobes, G., Panagiotaki, G., & Pawson, C. (2009). The influence of negligence, intention, and outcome on children’s moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(4), 382-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.08.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Olson, K. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2008). Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition, 108(1), 222-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.003
dc.relation/*ref*/Ortiz, D. S. U., Botero, M. G., & Tobón, O. E. A. (2010). Teoría de la mente: una revisión acerca del desarrollo del concepto. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales, 1(1), 28-37. https://www.funlam.edu.co/revistas/index.php/RCCS/article/view/1169
dc.relation/*ref*/Reddy, V., & Morris, P. (2004). Participants don’t need theories: knowing minds in engagement. Theory & Psychology, 14(5), 647-665. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234383_5
dc.relation/*ref*/Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., Conry-Murray, C., & Sturge-Apple, M. L. (2012). Reciprocal Associations Between Young Children's Developing Moral Judgments and Theory of Mind. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1144-1155. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025891
dc.relation/*ref*/Sodian, B., Licata, M., Kristen‐Antonow, S., Paulus, M., Killen, M., & Woodward, A. (2016). Understanding of goals, beliefs, and desires predicts morally relevant theory of mind: A longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 87(4), 1221-1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12533
dc.relation/*ref*/Tirapu-Ustárroz, J., Pérez-Sayes, G., Erekatxo-Bilbao, M., & Pelegrín-Valero, C. (2007). ¿Qué es la teoría de la mente? Revista de Neurología, 44(8), 479-489. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.4408.2006295
dc.relation/*ref*/Tomasello, M., & Vaish, A. (2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual review of psychology, 64, 231-255. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812
dc.relation/*ref*/Vaish, A., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children selectively avoid helping people with harmful intentions. Child Development, 81(6), 1661-1669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01500.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
dc.relation/*ref*/Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Saxe, R. (2007). The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(20), 8235-8240. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701408104
dc.relation/*ref*/Young, L., & Saxe, R. (2008). The neural basis of belief encoding and integration in moral judgment. Neuroimage, 40(4), 1912-1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.057
dc.relation/*ref*/Young, L., Camprodon, J. A., Hauser, M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Saxe, R. (2010). Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(15), 6753-6758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914826107
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2018 Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos de Psicologíaes-ES
dc.sourceCuadernos Hispanoamericanos de Psicología; Vol 18 No 2 (2018): Cuadernos Hispanoamercanos de Psicología; 1-16en-US
dc.sourceCuadernos Hispanoamericanos de Psicología; ##issue.vol## 18 ##issue.no## 2 (2018): Cuadernos Hispanoamercanos de Psicología; 1-16es-AR
dc.sourceCuadernos Hispanoamericanos de Psicología; Vol. 18 Núm. 2 (2018): Cuadernos Hispanoamercanos de Psicología; 1-16es-ES
dc.source2346-0253
dc.source1657-3412
dc.subjectjuicio morales-ES
dc.subjectTeoría de la Mente (ToM)es-ES
dc.subjectTeoría de la Mente Moralmente Relevante (MoToM)es-ES
dc.subjectlectura intencionales-ES
dc.subjecttarea de falsa creenciaes-ES
dc.titleIntentional Variation in Morally Relevant Theory of Mind (MoToM) Tasksen-US
dc.titleVariación intencional en tareas de Teoría de la Mente Moralmente relevante (MoToM)es-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePDFen-US
dc.typePDFes-ES


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem