Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Physicochemical properties of seven outstanding strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) varieties cultivated in Cundinamarca (Colombia) during maturation

Propiedades fisicoquímicas en frutos de siete variedades de fresa (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) durante su maduración

dc.creatorFischer, Gerhard
dc.creatorLópez-Valencia, David
dc.creatorSánchez-Gómez, Manuel
dc.creatorAcuña-Caita, John Fabio
dc.date2017-12-21
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-04T20:35:52Z
dc.date.available2020-08-04T20:35:52Z
dc.identifierhttp://revista.corpoica.org.co/index.php/revista/article/view/528
dc.identifier10.21930/rcta.vol19_num1_art:528
dc.identifier.urihttp://test.repositoriodigital.com:8080/handle/123456789/4625
dc.descriptionThe strawberry market in Cundinamarca (Colombia) is mainly size driven with no consideration for its maturation state and nutritional quality, wasting therefore, its organoleptic and nutritional potential. For that reason, the physicochemical differences among seven strawberry varieties (Albión, Dulce Ana, Lucía, Monterrey, Ruby June, Sabrina and Ventana) cultivated in the municipality of Sibaté (Cundinamarca) were established. Fruits collected from a productive plot with homogeneous cultivation management conditions were analyzed in six maturity states, establishing the degree of red pigmentation according to the Colombian Standard ntc 4103. Fresh weight, size, color, firmness, total soluble solids (tss), total titratable acidity (tta), maturity and respiration indices were evaluated. Fruits in stages 4, 2 and 3 developed their largest size and weight, where the variety Dulce Ana stands out. The highest color index values were found in the maturity stage 5 in the variety Ventana. Moreover, the highest firmness values were recorded in stages 4 and 5 in the varieties Monterrey and Ventana. The varieties Sabrina, Dulce Ana and Monterrey accumulated the highest tss concentration and the last two showed the best maturity relations. Respiration rates increased with maturation, especially from stage 3. The results suggest that the optimum commercialization and consumption points are stages 3 and 4, namely because these stages exhibit the highest maturity index and fruit weight. Among the varieties studied, Monterrey stands out due to its firmness and maturity index.en-US
dc.descriptionEl mercado de la fresa en Cundinamarca (Colombia) se rige por el tamaño del fruto, sin tener en cuenta el estado de maduración y calidad nutricional del mismo. Por esta razón, se determinaron las diferencias fisicoquímicas en frutos de siete variedades de fresa (Albion, Dulce Anna, Lucia, Monterey, Ruby June, Sabrina y Ventana) cultivadas en el municipio de Sibaté, segundo productor de Cundinamarca. Se analizaron frutos recolectados de un predio productivo con condiciones homogéneas de manejo, en seis estados de madurez determinados por su grado de pigmentación roja (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) de acuerdo a la Norma Colombiana NTC 4103. Se evaluó el peso fresco, tamaño, color, firmeza, solidos solubles totales (SST), acidez total titulable (ATT), índices de madurez y de respiración. En los estados 4, 2 y 3 los frutos desarrollaron su mayor tamaño y peso, destacándose la variedad Dulce Anna. Los valores más altos en el índice de color se encontraron en el estado de madurez 5, especialmente en la variedad Ventana, seguida de Albion, Ruby June y Sabrina. Los valores más altos de firmeza, en los estados 4 y 5, se observaron para Ventana y Sabrina. Las variedades Sabrina, Dulce Anna y Monterrey acumularon la mayor concentración de SST, mostrando las dos últimas la mejor relación de madurez. Las tasas de respiración aumentaron con la maduración, especialmente a partir del estados 3. Los resultados ofrecen un criterio de selección en el punto óptimo para consumo, acorde con la variedad y sus características más relevantes.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherCorporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Agrosavia)es-ES
dc.relationhttp://revista.corpoica.org.co/index.php/revista/article/view/528/507
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2017 Corpoica Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuariaes-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.eses-ES
dc.sourceCiencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2018); 147-162en-US
dc.sourceCiencia & Tecnología Agropecuaria; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2018); 147-162es-ES
dc.sourcerevista Corpoica Ciência e Tecnologia Agropecuária; v. 19 n. 1 (2018); 147-162pt-BR
dc.source2500-5308
dc.source0122-8706
dc.source10.21930/rcta.vol19-num1
dc.subjectfresh weighten-US
dc.subjectcoloren-US
dc.subjectsoluble solidsen-US
dc.subjectrespirationen-US
dc.subjectmaturity indexen-US
dc.subjectCundinamarcaen-US
dc.subjectpeso frescoes-ES
dc.subjectcolores-ES
dc.subjectsólidos solubleses-ES
dc.subjectrespiraciónes-ES
dc.subjectCundinamarcaes-ES
dc.subjectpeso frescopt-BR
dc.subjectcorpt-BR
dc.subjectsólidos solúveispt-BR
dc.subjectrespiraçãopt-BR
dc.subjectíndice de maturaopt-BR
dc.subjectCundinamarcapt-BR
dc.titlePhysicochemical properties of seven outstanding strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) varieties cultivated in Cundinamarca (Colombia) during maturationen-US
dc.titlePropiedades fisicoquímicas en frutos de siete variedades de fresa (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) durante su maduraciónes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.citationsAgronet. 2016. Producto fresa. [consultado 2016 abr]. http://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica Bagdasarian J. 2012. Strawberry plant named 'Sweet Ann' US PP22472 P3, Lassen Canyson Nursery. Bakker J, Bridle P, Bellworthy SJ. 1994. Strawberry juice colour: A study of the quantitative and qualitative pigment composition of juices from 39 genotypes. J Sci Food Agr 64:31-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740640106 Cheng GW, Breen PJ. 1991. Activity of phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) and concentrations of anthocyanins and phenolics in developing strawberry fruit. J Am Soc Hort Sci 116:865-869. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.116.5.865 Cordenunsi BR, Nascimento JRO, Genovese MI, Lajolo FM. 2002. Influence of cultivar on quality parameters and chemical composition of strawberry fruits grown in Brazil. J Agr Food Chem. 50:2581-2586. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011421i [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2014. Producción y comercio de fresa a nivel mundial. [consultado 2016 abr]. http://www.fao.org/statistics/databases Figueiredo FC, Botrel PP, Teixeira CP, Petrazzini LL, Locarno M, Carvalho JG. 2010. Pulverização foliar e fertirrigação com silício nos atributos físico-químicos de qualidade e índices de coloração do morango. Ciê Agrotecnol. 34(5):1306-1311. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542010000500032 Fischer G, Ramírez F, Almanza-Merchán PJ. 2012a. Inducción floral, floración y desarrollo del fruto. pp. 120-140. En: Fischer G, editor. Manual para el cultivo de frutales en el trópico. Bogotá: Produmedios. Fischer G, Almanza-Merchán PJ. Ramírez F. 2012b. Source-sink relationships in fruit species. A review. Rev Colomb Cienc Hortic. 6(2):238-253. https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2012v6i2.1980 Forney CF, Kalt W, McDonald, JE, Jordan MA. 1998. Changes in strawberry fruit quality during ripening on and off the plant. Acta Hortic. 464:506. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.464.98 Given NK, Venis MA, Grierson D. 1988. Phenylalanine ammonialyase activity and anthocyanin synthesis in ripening strawberry fruit. J Plant Physiol. 133:25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(88)80079-8 Goulas V, Manganaris GA. 2011. The effect of postharvest ripening on strawberry bioactive composition and antioxidant potential. J Sci Food Agric 91(10):1907-1914. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4406 Grijalba CM, Pérez-Trujillo MM, Ruíz D, Ferrucho, AM. 2015. Strawberry yields with high-tunnel and open-field cultivations and the relationship with vegetative and reproductive plant characteristics. Agron Colomb. 33(2):147-154. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v33n2.52000 Haig BJ. 2013. Strawberry plant named 'Lucia' Patent application number: 20150128318. Halvorsen BL, Carlsen MH, Phillips KM, Bøhn SK, Holte K, Jacobs DR, Blomhoff R. 2006. Content of redox-active compounds (ie. antioxidants ) in foods consumed in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 84:95-135. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/84.1.95 Hancock JF. 1999. Strawberries. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing. Herrera AA. 2010. Poscosecha de perecederos - Prácticas de laboratorio. Bogotá: Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. [ICONTEC] Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación. 1997. Frutas frescas. Fresa variedad Chandler. Especificaciones. Norma Técnica Colombiana NTC 4103. Bogotá, Colombia. Kader AA. 1991. Quality and its maintenance in relation to postharvest physiology of strawberry. pp. 145-152. Houston, TX, USA: Proceedings of the Third North American Strawberry Conference. Kader AA. 1999. Fruit maturity, ripening, and quality relationships. Acta Hortic. 485:203 208. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.485.27 Kader AA. 2002. Postharvest biology and technology: An overview. pp. 39-47. En: Kader AA, editor. Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. 3a edición. Publicación 3311. Oakland, California: University of California. Kafkas E, Kosar M, Paydas S, Kafkas S, Baser KHC. 2007. Quality characteristics of strawberry genotypes at different maturation stages. Food Chem. 100(3):1229-1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.12.005 Kallio H, Hakala M, Pelkkikangas AM, Lapvetela IA. 2000. Sugars and acids of strawberries varieties. Eur Food Res Technol. 212: 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002170000244 Koh TH, Melton LD. 2002. Ripening-related changes in cell wall polysaccharides of strawberry cortical and pith tissues. Postharvest Biol Technol. 26:23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00003-0 Larson KD, Shaw DV. 2003. Strawberry plant named 'Venta' United States Plant Patent US PP13,469 P3. Mazza G, Miniati E. 1993. Anthocyanins in fruits, vegetables and frains. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. Ménager I, Jost M, Aubert C. 2004. Changes in physicochemical characteristics and volatile constituents of strawberry (cv. Cigaline) during maturation. J Agr Food Chem. 52:1248-1254. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0350919 Moing A, Renaud C, Gaudillère M, Raymond P, Roudeillac P, Denoyes-Rothan B. 2001. Biochemical changes during fruit development of four strawberry cultivars. J Am Soc Hort Sci. 126:394-403. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.126.4.394 Morvai M, Molnar-Perl I, Knausz D. 1991. Simultaneous gas-liquid chromatographic determination of sugars and organic acids as trimethylsilyl derivatives in vegetables and strawberries. J Chromatography 552:337-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)95950-3 Nielsen SS. 2009. Food analysis laboratory manual. 2a edición. West Lafayette, IN, USA: Springer. Nunes MCN. 2008. Color atlas of postharvest quality of fruits and vegetables, Chapter 3, Soft fruits and berries. pp. 175-185. Ames, USA: John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780813802947 Nunes MCN, Brecht JK, Morais AMMB, Sargent SA. 2006. Physicochemical changes during strawberry development in the field compared with those that occur in harvested fruit during storage. J Sci Food Agr. 86:180-190. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2314 Nunes MCN, Morais AMMB. 2002. Fruit maturity and storage temperature influence response of strawberry to controlled atmospheres. J Am Soc Hort Sci. 127(5): 836-842. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.127.5.836 Ogiwara I, Habutsu S, Hakoda N, Shimura I. 1998. Soluble sugar content in fruit of nine wild and forty-one cultivated strawberries. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci. 67:406-412. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.67.406 Olmue Colombia. 2010. Oportunidad fruticola de Colombia. Piña, Mango y Fresa. [Consultado 2016 ago]. http://www.asohofrucol.com.co/archivos/biblioteca/biblioteca_184_Oportunidad%20Frut%C3%ADcola%20de%20Colombia.pdf. Paliyath G, Murr DP, Handa AK, Lurie S. 2008. Postharvest biology and technology of fruits, vegetables, and flowers. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. Perkins V.P. 1995. Growth and ripening of strawberry fruit. Hort Rev. 17:267-297. Pineli L, Moretti C, Santos M, Campos A. 2011. Antioxidants and other chemical and physical characteristics of two strawberry cultivars at different ripeness stages. J Food Comp Anal. 24:11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2010.05.004 Pierron DA. 2012. Strawberry plant named 'Sabrina' Plantas De Navarra, S.A. Valtierra, Navarra, España. Priya M, Prabha N, Tharanathan N. 1996. Postharvest biochemical changes associated with the softening phenomenon in Capsicum nahum fruits. Phytochem. 42:961-966. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(96)00057-X Rahman, MM, Moniruzzaman M, Ahmad MR, Sarker BC, Alam MK. 2016. Maturity stages affect the postharvest quality and shelf-life of fruits of strawberry genotypes growing in subtropical regions. J Saudi Soc Agr Sci. 15:28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2014.05.002 Ruiz A. 1988. Producción de fresas y fresones. Madrid, España: Mundi-Prensa. Ruiz R, Piedrahíta W. 2012. Fresa (Fragaria x ananassa). pp. 474-495. En: Fischer G, editor. Manual para el cultivo de frutales en el trópico. Bogotá: Produmedios. Salamat R, Ghassemzadeh HR, Heris SSS, Hajilou J. 2013. Determination of appropriate harvesting time for strawberry to enhance its flavor index and reduce bruising susceptibility. Intl J Agron Plant Prod. 4(8):1969-1977. Salunkhe DK, Bologna HR, Reddy NR. 1991. Storage, processing and nutritional quality of fresh fruits and vegetables. Vol. I, 2a edición. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. Seymour G, Taylor J, Tucker G. 1993. Biochemistry of fruit ripening. London UK; Chapman and Hall. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1584-1 Shaw DV. 1988. Genotypic variation and genotypic correlations for sugars and organic acids of strawberries. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 113:770-774. Shaw DV, Larson KD. 2006. Strawberry named 'Albion'. The Regents of the University California, Patent NO.: US PP16,228 P3, US 2005/0172374 P1. Shaw, DV, Larson KD. 2009. Strawberry plant named 'Monterey'. The Regents of the University California Oakland CA (US), Patent NO.: US PP19,767 P2. Sturm K, Koron D, Stampar F. 2003. The composition of fruit of different strawberry varieties depending on maturity stage. Food Chem 83:417-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00124-9 [USDA] United State Department of Agriculture. 2013. Economics, stadistics and market information system. [consultado 2016 abr]. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/MannUsda/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1381 Vicente AR, Martínez GA, Civello PM, Chaves AR. 2002. Quality of heat-treated strawberry fruit during refrigerated storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 25:59-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00142-9 Vignoni LA, Césari, RM, Forte M, Mirábile ML. 2006. Determinación de índice de color en ajo Picado. Información Tecnológica 17:63-67. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642006000600011 Wang SY. 2007. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic con-tent of berry fruits as affected by genotype, prehar-vest conditions, maturity, and postharvest handling. pp. 147-178. En: Zhao Y, editor. Berry fruit: Value-added products for health promotion. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420006148.ch5 Wills R, McGlasson B, Graham D, Joyce D. 2007. Postharvest - An introduction to the physiology and handling of fruit, vegetables and ornamentals. 5a edición. Wallingford UK: CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932275.0013 Xie Z, Fan J, Charles MT, Charlebois D, Khanizadeh S, Rolland D, Roussel D, Zhang Z. 2016. Preharvest ultraviolet-C irradiation: Influence on physicochemical parameters associated with strawberry fruit quality. Plant Physiol Biochem. 108:337-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.07.0260


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem